ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 1x16GB 6400 CL32 vs Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6000 1x16GB CL30
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 1x16GB 6400 CL32 and Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6000 1x16GB CL30 arrive at the same true latency, 10.00 ns apiece. The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so what follows compares specifications alone.
| Specification | ADATAXPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 1x16GB 6400 CL32 | KingstonFURY Beast DDR5-6000 1x16GB CL30 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 16 | 16 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6400better | 6000 |
| 32 | 30 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00 | 10.00 |
| Current best price | — | — |
| Price per GB | — | — |
Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 1x16GB 6400 CL32 vs Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6000 1x16GB CL30 in detail
True latency
Both kits land on 10.00 ns by different routes: ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 1x16GB 6400 CL32 at 6400 MT/s at CL32, Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6000 1x16GB CL30 at 6000 MT/s at CL30. A CAS number counts cycles rather than time, so a higher clock absorbs a looser one and the two arrive together — which is why these spec sheets look different and the memory does not.
Transfer rate
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 1x16GB 6400 CL32 is rated 6400 MT/s against 6000 MT/s for Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6000 1x16GB CL30 — 51200 MB/s per module, against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 1x16GB 6400 CL32 ships as 2 × 8GB and Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6000 1x16GB CL30 ships as 2 × 8GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Lighting
On the lighting question: ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 1x16GB 6400 CL32 does not have RGB lighting, and Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6000 1x16GB CL30 does not have RGB lighting.
Which to buy
No buying answer is possible while at least one of the two has no tracked price. The specifications do not decide it either — both land on 10.00 ns of true latency — so the choice rests on what the sections above show.
Common questions about this pair
- Is ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 1x16GB 6400 CL32 faster than Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6000 1x16GB CL30?
- Neither. Both come out at 10.00 ns of true latency: ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 1x16GB 6400 CL32 runs 6400 MT/s at CL32 and Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6000 1x16GB CL30 runs 6000 MT/s at CL30, and the two reconcile to one figure.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- No buying answer is possible while at least one of the two has no tracked price. The specifications do not decide it either — both land on 10.00 ns of true latency — so the choice rests on what the sections above show.