Skip to main content

ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB vs Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36

ADATAXPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB32 GB · 6400 MT/s · 32 CL · 10.00 nsLeads on Speed
Silicon PowerValue Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL3632 GB · 6000 MT/s · 36 CL · 12.00 nsLeads on Current best price
In short

ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB has the lower true latency of the two at 10.00 ns, against 12.00 ns for Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36. Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 is the cheaper of the two at the prices tracked here, so each kit leads on one axis and neither leads on both.

SpecificationADATAXPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GBSilicon PowerValue Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36
Capacity (GB)3232
Speed (MT/s)6400better6000
3236
True latency (ns)10.00better12.00
Current best price$1,027.89at Amazon.ca · captured 2026-09-15$619.97betterat Amazon.ca · captured 2026-09-15
Price per GB$32.12$19.37better

ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB vs Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 in detail

True latency

ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 10.00 ns, against 12.00 ns for Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 — a difference of 2.00 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32; Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 runs 6000 MT/s at CL36.

Transfer rate

ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is rated 6400 MT/s against 6000 MT/s for Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 — 51200 MB/s per module, against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.

Price and tracked history

ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is tracked at $1,027.89 — $32.12 per gigabyte — and Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 at $619.97, or $19.37. Both are 32GB kits, so the totals compare directly: Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 is $407.92 less than ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB. At $1,027.89, ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is running 10% below its own 90-day median. At $619.97, Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 is running 31% below its own 90-day median.

Kit layout

ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.

Voltage

ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is specified at 1.4 V and Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 at 1.35 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile asks the board for.

Lighting and timings

On the lighting question: ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is published with RGB lighting, and Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 32-39-39, and Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 runs 30-38-38-96.

Which to buy

The two split the axes this page measures, so no one kit is the answer. The lower tracked price belongs to Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36; the lower true latency to ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB, 10.00 ns against 12.00 ns. Weighing money against latency is a decision about the machine, and it stays with the reader.

Common questions about this pair

Is ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB faster than Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36?
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is, on true latency: 10.00 ns against 12.00 ns. ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32 and Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 runs 6000 MT/s at CL36; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
Which one costs less?
Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36, at $619.97 against $1,027.89 — $407.92 apart at the same 32GB.
Which of these two should I buy?
The two split the axes this page measures, so no one kit is the answer. The lower tracked price belongs to Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36; the lower true latency to ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB, 10.00 ns against 12.00 ns. Weighing money against latency is a decision about the machine, and it stays with the reader.
How we track prices

Related comparisons