Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200

CorsairVengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB64 GB · 4800 MT/s · 40 CL · 16.67 ns
TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 520064 GB · 5200 MT/s · 40 CL · 15.38 nsLeads on Speed
In short

On true latency TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 comes out ahead: 15.38 ns, where Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB takes 16.67 ns. TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 is tracked at the lower price as well, so it leads on both axes this page measures.

SpecificationCorsairVengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GBTeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200
Capacity (GB)6464
Speed (MT/s)48005200better
4040
True latency (ns)16.6715.38better
Current best price$1,302.99at Newegg Canada · captured 2026-09-09$1,219.99betterat Newegg Canada · captured 2026-09-09
Price per GB$20.36$19.06better

Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 in detail

True latency

TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 is the lower-latency kit at 15.38 ns, against 16.67 ns for Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB — a difference of 1.28 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB runs 4800 MT/s at CL40; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 runs 5200 MT/s at CL40.

Transfer rate

TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 is rated 5200 MT/s against 4800 MT/s for Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB — 41600 MB/s per module, against 38400 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time. Both kits are published at CL40, so the same count of cycles takes less time at the higher clock, and the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.

Price and tracked history

Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB is tracked at $1,302.99 — $20.36 per gigabyte — and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 at $1,219.99, or $19.06. Both are 64GB kits, so the totals compare directly: TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 is $83.00 less than Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB. At $1,302.99, Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB is running 1% below its own 90-day median. $1,219.99 is the lowest price this site has recorded for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200.

Kit layout

Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB ships as 2 × 32GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 ships as 2 × 32GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.

Voltage

Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB is specified at 1.1 V and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 at 1.35 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile asks the board for.

Lighting

On the lighting question: Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB does not have RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 is published with RGB lighting.

Which to buy

TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 leads Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB on both of the axes this page measures: the lower true latency, 15.38 ns against 16.67 ns, and the lower price of the two at what this site has tracked.

Common questions about this pair

Is Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200?
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 is, on true latency: 15.38 ns against 16.67 ns. Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB runs 4800 MT/s at CL40 and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 runs 5200 MT/s at CL40; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
Which one costs less?
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200, at $1,219.99 against $1,302.99 — $83.00 apart at the same 64GB.
Which of these two should I buy?
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB CL40 5200 leads Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x32GB on both of the axes this page measures: the lower true latency, 15.38 ns against 16.67 ns, and the lower price of the two at what this site has tracked.
How we track prices

Related comparisons