Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x16GB 4400 CL19 vs G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB
On true latency Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x16GB 4400 CL19 comes out ahead: 8.64 ns, where G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB takes 8.89 ns. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | CrucialBallistix DDR4-3200 2x16GB 4400 CL19 | G.SKILLRipjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 4400better | 3600 |
| 19 | 16 | |
| True latency (ns) | 8.64better | 8.89 |
| Current best price | — | $349.99at Newegg Canada · captured 2026-09-09 |
| Price per GB | — | $10.94 |
No tracked price for Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x16GB 4400 CL19 at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x16GB 4400 CL19 vs G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB in detail
True latency
Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x16GB 4400 CL19 is the lower-latency kit at 8.64 ns, against 8.89 ns for G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB — a difference of 0.25 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x16GB 4400 CL19 runs 4400 MT/s at CL19; G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 3600 MT/s at CL16.
Transfer rate
Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x16GB 4400 CL19 is rated 4400 MT/s against 3600 MT/s for G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB — 35200 MB/s per module, against 28800 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x16GB 4400 CL19 ships as 2 × 16GB and G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Lighting and timings
On the lighting question: Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x16GB 4400 CL19 is published with RGB lighting, and G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x16GB 4400 CL19 does not publish one, and G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 16-19-19-39.
Which to buy
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x16GB 4400 CL19 is the quicker at 8.64 ns of true latency.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x16GB 4400 CL19 faster than G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB?
- Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x16GB 4400 CL19 is, on true latency: 8.64 ns against 8.89 ns. Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x16GB 4400 CL19 runs 4400 MT/s at CL19 and G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 3600 MT/s at CL16; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3200 2x16GB 4400 CL19 is the quicker at 8.64 ns of true latency.