Crucial DDR4 SODIMM 2666 1x16GB 2133 CL15 vs G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4-3200 SODIMM 1x16GB

CrucialDDR4 SODIMM 2666 1x16GB 2133 CL1516 GB · 2133 MT/s · 15 CL · 14.06 ns
G.SkillRipjaws DDR4-3200 SODIMM 1x16GB16 GB · 3200 MT/s · 22 CL · 13.75 nsLeads on Speed
In short

G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4-3200 SODIMM 1x16GB has the lower true latency of the two at 13.75 ns, against 14.06 ns for Crucial DDR4 SODIMM 2666 1x16GB 2133 CL15. On top of the latency, G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4-3200 SODIMM 1x16GB carries the lower tracked price, so both measured axes point the same way.

SpecificationCrucialDDR4 SODIMM 2666 1x16GB 2133 CL15G.SkillRipjaws DDR4-3200 SODIMM 1x16GB
Capacity (GB)1616
Speed (MT/s)21333200better
1522
True latency (ns)14.0613.75better
Current best price$193.70at Newegg Canada · captured 2026-09-09$179.99betterat Newegg Canada · captured 2026-09-09
Price per GB$12.11$11.25better

Crucial DDR4 SODIMM 2666 1x16GB 2133 CL15 vs G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4-3200 SODIMM 1x16GB in detail

True latency

G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4-3200 SODIMM 1x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 13.75 ns, against 14.06 ns for Crucial DDR4 SODIMM 2666 1x16GB 2133 CL15 — a difference of 0.32 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. Crucial DDR4 SODIMM 2666 1x16GB 2133 CL15 runs 2133 MT/s at CL15; G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4-3200 SODIMM 1x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL22.

Transfer rate

G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4-3200 SODIMM 1x16GB is rated 3200 MT/s against 2133 MT/s for Crucial DDR4 SODIMM 2666 1x16GB 2133 CL15 — 25600 MB/s per module, against 17064 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.

Price and tracked history

Crucial DDR4 SODIMM 2666 1x16GB 2133 CL15 is tracked at $193.70 — $12.11 per gigabyte — and G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4-3200 SODIMM 1x16GB at $179.99, or $11.25. Both are 16GB kits, so the totals compare directly: G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4-3200 SODIMM 1x16GB is $13.71 less than Crucial DDR4 SODIMM 2666 1x16GB 2133 CL15. $193.70 is the lowest price this site has recorded for Crucial DDR4 SODIMM 2666 1x16GB 2133 CL15. At $179.99, G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4-3200 SODIMM 1x16GB is running 21% below its own 90-day median.

Kit layout

Crucial DDR4 SODIMM 2666 1x16GB 2133 CL15 ships as 1 × 16GB, G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4-3200 SODIMM 1x16GB ships as 2 × 8GB. That is a real difference and not a ranking: more sticks fill more channels on a board that has them, while fewer sticks leave slots free for a later addition. Which suits depends on the board and on whether more memory is planned.

Lighting and timings

On the lighting question: Crucial DDR4 SODIMM 2666 1x16GB 2133 CL15 does not have RGB lighting, and G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4-3200 SODIMM 1x16GB does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: Crucial DDR4 SODIMM 2666 1x16GB 2133 CL15 does not publish one, and G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4-3200 SODIMM 1x16GB runs 22-22-22-52.

Which to buy

G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4-3200 SODIMM 1x16GB leads Crucial DDR4 SODIMM 2666 1x16GB 2133 CL15 on both of the axes this page measures: the lower true latency, 13.75 ns against 14.06 ns, and the lower price of the two at what this site has tracked.

Common questions about this pair

Is Crucial DDR4 SODIMM 2666 1x16GB 2133 CL15 faster than G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4-3200 SODIMM 1x16GB?
G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4-3200 SODIMM 1x16GB is, on true latency: 13.75 ns against 14.06 ns. Crucial DDR4 SODIMM 2666 1x16GB 2133 CL15 runs 2133 MT/s at CL15 and G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4-3200 SODIMM 1x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL22; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
Which one costs less?
G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4-3200 SODIMM 1x16GB, at $179.99 against $193.70 — $13.71 apart at the same 16GB.
Which of these two should I buy?
G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4-3200 SODIMM 1x16GB leads Crucial DDR4 SODIMM 2666 1x16GB 2133 CL15 on both of the axes this page measures: the lower true latency, 13.75 ns against 14.06 ns, and the lower price of the two at what this site has tracked.
How we track prices

Related comparisons