G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB 3600 CL16 vs TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB
On true latency TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB comes out ahead: 7.78 ns, where G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB 3600 CL16 takes 8.89 ns. TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB is also the cheaper of the two at the prices tracked here, so it leads on both of the axes this page measures.
| Specification | G.SkillTrident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB 3600 CL16 | TeamGroupT-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 3600 | 3600 |
| 16 | 14 | |
| True latency (ns) | 8.89 | 7.78better |
| Current best price | $399.99at Amazon.ca · captured 2026-09-13 | $299.99betterat Newegg Canada · captured 2026-09-09 |
| Price per GB | $12.50 | $9.37better |
G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB 3600 CL16 vs TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 7.78 ns against 8.89 ns for G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB 3600 CL16, 1.11 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB 3600 CL16 runs 3600 MT/s at CL16; TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 3600 MT/s at CL14.
Transfer rate
Both kits are rated 3600 MT/s, or 28800 MB/s per module. They part company on CAS latency instead of on clock, so the true-latency figures above are what tells them apart.
Price and tracked history
G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB 3600 CL16 is tracked at $399.99, or $12.50 per gigabyte; TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB at $299.99, or $9.37. At the same 32GB, that puts TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB $100.00 less than G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB 3600 CL16. G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB 3600 CL16's $399.99 sits 19% under its own 90-day median. $299.99 is the lowest this site has ever recorded for TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB.
Kit layout
G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB 3600 CL16 ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Lighting
On lighting: G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB 3600 CL16 has RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB is published with no RGB lighting.
Which to buy
TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB leads G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB 3600 CL16 on both of the axes this page measures: the lower true latency, 7.78 ns against 8.89 ns, and the lower price of the two at what this site has tracked.
Common questions about this pair
- Is G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB 3600 CL16 faster than TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB?
- Yes, on true latency: 7.78 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB against 8.89 ns for G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB 3600 CL16. G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB 3600 CL16 runs 3600 MT/s at CL16 and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 3600 MT/s at CL14, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which one costs less?
- TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB, tracked at $299.99 against $399.99: $100.00 between them at the same 32GB.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB leads G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB 3600 CL16 on both of the axes this page measures: the lower true latency, 7.78 ns against 8.89 ns, and the lower price of the two at what this site has tracked.