G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB

G.SkillTrident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB32 GB · 4000 MT/s · 16 CL · 8.00 nsLeads on Speed
TeamGroupT-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB32 GB · 3600 MT/s · 14 CL · 7.78 nsLeads on True latency
In short

7.78 ns of true latency for TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB against 8.00 ns for G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. On top of the latency, TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB carries the lower tracked price, so both measured axes point the same way.

SpecificationG.SkillTrident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GBTeamGroupT-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB
Capacity (GB)3232
Speed (MT/s)4000better3600
1614
True latency (ns)8.007.78better
Current best price$1,338.00at Newegg Canada · captured 2026-09-09$299.99betterat Newegg Canada · captured 2026-09-09
Price per GB$41.81$9.37better

G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB in detail

True latency

TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 7.78 ns, against 8.00 ns for G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB — a difference of 0.22 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB runs 4000 MT/s at CL16; TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 3600 MT/s at CL14.

Transfer rate

G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB is rated 4000 MT/s against 3600 MT/s for TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB — 32000 MB/s per module, against 28800 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.

Price and tracked history

G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB is tracked at $1,338.00 — $41.81 per gigabyte — and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB at $299.99, or $9.37. Both are 32GB kits, so the totals compare directly: TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB is $1,038.01 less than G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB. $1,338.00 is the lowest price this site has recorded for G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB. $299.99 is the lowest price this site has recorded for TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB.

Kit layout

G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.

Lighting

On the lighting question: G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB is published with RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting.

Which to buy

Both axes this page measures point to TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB: 7.78 ns of true latency against 8.00 ns, and the lower of the two tracked prices.

Common questions about this pair

Is G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB?
TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB is, on true latency: 7.78 ns against 8.00 ns. G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB runs 4000 MT/s at CL16 and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 3600 MT/s at CL14; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
Which one costs less?
TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB, at $299.99 against $1,338.00 — $1,038.01 apart at the same 32GB.
Which of these two should I buy?
Both axes this page measures point to TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB: 7.78 ns of true latency against 8.00 ns, and the lower of the two tracked prices.
How we track prices

Related comparisons