Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB vs KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28
On true latency KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 comes out ahead: 9.33 ns, where Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB takes 14.29 ns. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | KingstonFURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB | KLEVVFIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 5600 | 6000better |
| 40 | 28 | |
| True latency (ns) | 14.29 | 9.33better |
| Current best price | $769.99at Amazon.ca · captured 2026-09-13 | — |
| Price per GB | $24.06 | — |
No tracked price for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB vs KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 in detail
True latency
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is the lower-latency kit at 9.33 ns against 14.29 ns for Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB, 4.95 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL40; KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28.
Transfer rate
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 carries the higher rating, 6000 MT/s to 5600 MT/s for Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB — 48000 MB/s per module against 44800 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Voltage
Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB is specified at 1.25 V and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 at 1.35 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile requests from the board.
Lighting and timings
On lighting: Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB is published with no RGB lighting, and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is published with no RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB is 40-40-40, and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is 28-36-36-76.
Which to buy
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is the quicker at 9.33 ns of true latency.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB faster than KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28?
- Yes, on true latency: 9.33 ns for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 against 14.29 ns for Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB. Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-5600 2x16GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL40 and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is the quicker at 9.33 ns of true latency.