ADATA XPG Gammix S70 Blade 2TB vs Samsung 990 Pro 2TB

ADATAXPG Gammix S70 Blade 2TB2000 GB · 7400 MB/s · 6800 MB/s · 1480 TBWLeads on Endurance
Samsung990 Pro 2TB2000 GB · 7450 MB/s · 6900 MB/s · 1200 TBWLeads on Sequential read
In short

On the measures that settle this, Samsung 990 Pro 2TB never comes out behind, and on at least one it comes out ahead.

SpecificationADATAXPG Gammix S70 Blade 2TBSamsung990 Pro 2TB
Capacity (GB)20002000
Sequential read (MB/s)74007450better
Sequential write (MB/s)68006900better
Current best price350,00 €at Amazon.de · captured 2026-09-13319,99 €betterat Amazon.de · captured 2026-09-13
Price per TB175,00 €160,00 €better
Endurance (TBW)1480better1200
Warranty (years)55
DRAM cacheYesYes
NAND typetlctlc
ControllerInnoGrit IG5236Samsung Pascal

How these two compare

Sequential throughput

ADATA XPG Gammix S70 Blade 2TB is rated 7400 MB/s read and 6800 MB/s write; Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, 7450 MB/s read and 6900 MB/s write. These are peak sequential rates over PCIe — the speed you would see copying one large file. For boot, app launches and everyday feel, random access matters more than this headline figure.

Price

ADATA XPG Gammix S70 Blade 2TB lists at 350,00 €, or 175,00 € per TB; Samsung 990 Pro 2TB at 319,99 €, or 160,00 € per TB.

Endurance

The makers warrant 1480 TBW on ADATA XPG Gammix S70 Blade 2TB and 1200 TBW on Samsung 990 Pro 2TB — how much writing each is rated to take before the endurance clause lapses. Most desktop workloads never come close, so read the two against each other rather than as a limit you are likely to reach.

DRAM cache

ADATA XPG Gammix S70 Blade 2TB carries a DRAM cache; Samsung 990 Pro 2TB carries a DRAM cache. A DRAM cache holds the drive's mapping table — the index of where each block physically sits — so the controller places and finds data without an extra flash lookup. A DRAM-less drive borrows a little system memory (HMB) or a slice of its own flash instead, and is likelier to slow once a long run of random writes outlasts its fast cache.

NAND, controller and warranty

NAND: ADATA XPG Gammix S70 Blade 2TB uses TLC and Samsung 990 Pro 2TB uses TLC. The tier is bits per cell — SLC, MLC, TLC and QLC from one to four — trading density against endurance and sustained-write speed: QLC is cheapest per gigabyte, TLC the mainstream balance, and the denser the cell the sooner sustained writes taper. On the controller: ADATA XPG Gammix S70 Blade 2TB uses the InnoGrit IG5236, and Samsung 990 Pro 2TB uses the Samsung Pascal. It is the chip handling error correction, wear-levelling and where each write lands — much of how a drive holds up under load — even if the part number on its own tells you little. On the cover: ADATA XPG Gammix S70 Blade 2TB carries a 5-year warranty, Samsung 990 Pro 2TB carries a 5-year warranty. The length is the maker's own vote of confidence, and on an SSD it tends to track the endurance rating — a longer warranty usually meaning more rated writes.

Which to buy

Samsung 990 Pro 2TB. It gives up nothing to the other on the measures the site tracks and leads on at least one, so there is no trade to weigh — the sections above show where the margin is.

Common questions about this pair

Which is faster, ADATA XPG Gammix S70 Blade 2TB or Samsung 990 Pro 2TB?
ADATA XPG Gammix S70 Blade 2TB is rated 7400 MB/s read and 6800 MB/s write; Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, 7450 MB/s read and 6900 MB/s write. These are peak sequential rates over PCIe — the speed you would see copying one large file. For boot, app launches and everyday feel, random access matters more than this headline figure.
Which costs less per terabyte, ADATA XPG Gammix S70 Blade 2TB or Samsung 990 Pro 2TB?
ADATA XPG Gammix S70 Blade 2TB lists at 350,00 €, or 175,00 € per TB; Samsung 990 Pro 2TB at 319,99 €, or 160,00 € per TB.
Should you buy ADATA XPG Gammix S70 Blade 2TB or Samsung 990 Pro 2TB?
Samsung 990 Pro 2TB. It gives up nothing to the other on the measures the site tracks and leads on at least one, so there is no trade to weigh — the sections above show where the margin is.
How we track prices

Related comparisons