ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 1x32GB 5600 CL46 vs Crucial DDR5-5600 Desktop Memory 1x32GB
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 1x32GB 5600 CL46 and Crucial DDR5-5600 Desktop Memory 1x32GB arrive at the same true latency, 16.43 ns apiece. Neither is quicker than the other; Crucial DDR5-5600 Desktop Memory 1x32GB is simply tracked at the lower price, and that is the whole of it.
| Specification | ADATAXPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 1x32GB 5600 CL46 | CrucialDDR5-5600 Desktop Memory 1x32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 5600 | 5600 |
| 46 | 46 | |
| True latency (ns) | 16.43 | 16.43 |
| Current best price | 552,07 €at Amazon.de · captured 2026-09-04 | 488,39 €betterat Amazon.de · captured 2026-09-12 |
| Price per GB | 17,25 € | 15,26 €better |
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 1x32GB 5600 CL46 vs Crucial DDR5-5600 Desktop Memory 1x32GB in detail
True latency
Both kits land on 16.43 ns. The two spec sheets state the same clock and the same CAS grade — 5600 MT/s at CL46 either way — and true latency is those two figures reconciled, so it comes out the same for each.
Transfer rate
Both kits are rated 5600 MT/s — 44800 MB/s per module — and both are published at CL46. The true latency above is computed from exactly those two figures, so it lands in the same place for each.
Price and tracked history
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 1x32GB 5600 CL46 is tracked at 552,07 € — 17,25 € per gigabyte — and Crucial DDR5-5600 Desktop Memory 1x32GB at 488,39 €, or 15,26 €. Both are 32GB kits, so the totals compare directly: Crucial DDR5-5600 Desktop Memory 1x32GB is 63,68 € less than ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 1x32GB 5600 CL46.
Kit layout
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 1x32GB 5600 CL46 ships as 2 × 16GB and Crucial DDR5-5600 Desktop Memory 1x32GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Voltage
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 1x32GB 5600 CL46 is specified at 1.35 V and Crucial DDR5-5600 Desktop Memory 1x32GB at 1.1 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile asks the board for.
Lighting and timings
On the lighting question: ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 1x32GB 5600 CL46 does not have RGB lighting, and Crucial DDR5-5600 Desktop Memory 1x32GB does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 1x32GB 5600 CL46 does not publish one, and Crucial DDR5-5600 Desktop Memory 1x32GB runs 46-45-45.
Which to buy
At the prices tracked here Crucial DDR5-5600 Desktop Memory 1x32GB undercuts ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 1x32GB 5600 CL46, and the two are level on true latency at 16.43 ns. What that separation buys is a lower price, not a quicker kit — nothing on this page says it will feel any different in use.
Common questions about this pair
- Is ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 1x32GB 5600 CL46 faster than Crucial DDR5-5600 Desktop Memory 1x32GB?
- Neither. Both come out at 16.43 ns of true latency: ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 1x32GB 5600 CL46 runs 5600 MT/s at CL46 and Crucial DDR5-5600 Desktop Memory 1x32GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL46, and the two reconcile to one figure.
- Which one costs less?
- Crucial DDR5-5600 Desktop Memory 1x32GB, at 488,39 € against 552,07 € — 63,68 € apart at the same 32GB.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- At the prices tracked here Crucial DDR5-5600 Desktop Memory 1x32GB undercuts ADATA XPG Lancer Blade DDR5-6000 1x32GB 5600 CL46, and the two are level on true latency at 16.43 ns. What that separation buys is a lower price, not a quicker kit — nothing on this page says it will feel any different in use.