ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB vs Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB and Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB arrive at the same true latency, 10.00 ns apiece. ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is the cheaper of the two at the prices tracked here, so what separates them is cost and not speed.
| Specification | ADATAXPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB | KingstonFURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6400 | 6400 |
| 32 | 32 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00 | 10.00 |
| Current best price | 531,91 €betterat Amazon.de · captured 2026-09-13 | 581,96 €at Amazon.de · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | 16,62 €better | 18,19 € |
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB vs Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB in detail
True latency
Both kits land on 10.00 ns. Neither spec sheet differs from the other on the two figures that decide it — 6400 MT/s at CL32 on each side — so the reconciled result is identical rather than merely close.
Transfer rate
Both kits are rated 6400 MT/s, which is 51200 MB/s per module, and both are published at CL32. Those are the two figures the true latency above is computed from, so it comes out the same for each.
Price and tracked history
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is tracked at 531,91 €, or 16,62 € per gigabyte; Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB at 581,96 €, or 18,19 €. At the same 32GB, that puts ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB 50,05 € less than Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB. ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB's 531,91 € sits 0% under its own 90-day median.
Kit layout
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Lighting, timings and ECC
On lighting: ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB has RGB lighting, and Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB is published with no RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is 32-39-39, and Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB is 32-39-39. On error correction: the catalog does not state whether ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB has it, and Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB is published without ECC. ECC is a board and CPU feature as much as a module one, so it is worth having only where the platform can use it.
Which to buy
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB leads on price alone. The two reconcile to the same 10.00 ns of true latency, so what separates them is only what this site has tracked them at. Cheaper, then, and not faster; this page claims nothing more.
Common questions about this pair
- Is ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB faster than Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB?
- Neither is. Both work out at 10.00 ns of true latency — ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32, Kingston FURY Beast DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32, and those two land in the same place.
- Which one costs less?
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB, tracked at 531,91 € against 581,96 €: 50,05 € between them at the same 32GB.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB leads on price alone. The two reconcile to the same 10.00 ns of true latency, so what separates them is only what this site has tracked them at. Cheaper, then, and not faster; this page claims nothing more.