ADATA XPG Lancer NEON RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB vs KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 has the lower true latency of the two at 9.33 ns, against 9.50 ns for ADATA XPG Lancer NEON RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB. At least one of the two has no tracked price right now, so what follows compares specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | ADATAXPG Lancer NEON RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB | KLEVVFIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 8000better | 6000 |
| 38 | 28 | |
| True latency (ns) | 9.50 | 9.33better |
| Current best price | 724,30 €at Amazon.de · captured 2026-09-13 | — |
| Price per GB | 22,63 € | — |
No tracked price for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
ADATA XPG Lancer NEON RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB vs KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 in detail
True latency
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is the lower-latency kit at 9.33 ns, against 9.50 ns for ADATA XPG Lancer NEON RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB — a difference of 0.17 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. ADATA XPG Lancer NEON RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB runs 8000 MT/s at CL38; KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28.
Transfer rate
ADATA XPG Lancer NEON RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB is rated 8000 MT/s against 6000 MT/s for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 — 64000 MB/s per module, against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
ADATA XPG Lancer NEON RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Voltage
ADATA XPG Lancer NEON RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB is specified at 1.45 V and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 at 1.35 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile asks the board for.
Lighting and timings
On the lighting question: ADATA XPG Lancer NEON RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB is published with RGB lighting, and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: ADATA XPG Lancer NEON RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB does not publish one, and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 28-36-36-76.
Which to buy
Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 has the lower true latency, 9.33 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is ADATA XPG Lancer NEON RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB faster than KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28?
- KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is, on true latency: 9.33 ns against 9.50 ns. ADATA XPG Lancer NEON RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB runs 8000 MT/s at CL38 and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 has the lower true latency, 9.33 ns.