Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB vs G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-5600 2x32GB
On true latency Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB comes out ahead: 9.70 ns, where G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-5600 2x32GB takes 12.86 ns. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | CorsairDominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB | G.SkillFlare X5 DDR5-5600 2x32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 64 | 64 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6600better | 5600 |
| 32 | 36 | |
| True latency (ns) | 9.70better | 12.86 |
| Current best price | 1.429,00 €at Amazon.de · captured 2026-09-15 | — |
| Price per GB | 22,33 € | — |
No tracked price for G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-5600 2x32GB at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB vs G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-5600 2x32GB in detail
True latency
Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB is the lower-latency kit at 9.70 ns, against 12.86 ns for G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-5600 2x32GB — a difference of 3.16 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB runs 6600 MT/s at CL32; G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-5600 2x32GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL36.
Transfer rate
Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB is rated 6600 MT/s against 5600 MT/s for G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-5600 2x32GB — 52800 MB/s per module, against 44800 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB ships as 2 × 32GB and G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-5600 2x32GB ships as 2 × 32GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Lighting, timings and ECC
On the lighting question: Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB is published with RGB lighting, and G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-5600 2x32GB does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB runs 32-39-39-76, and G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-5600 2x32GB does not publish one. On error correction: Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB is published with no ECC, and the catalog does not state whether G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-5600 2x32GB supports it. Whether ECC is worth having depends on the platform as much as the modules — the board and the CPU have to support it too.
Which to buy
At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give: which is worth more depends on what each costs, and that is exactly what is missing. On specifications alone, Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB has the lower true latency at 9.70 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB faster than G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-5600 2x32GB?
- Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB is, on true latency: 9.70 ns against 12.86 ns. Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB runs 6600 MT/s at CL32 and G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-5600 2x32GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL36; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give: which is worth more depends on what each costs, and that is exactly what is missing. On specifications alone, Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB has the lower true latency at 9.70 ns.