Corsair Vengeance DDR4-3200 SODIMM 2x16GB 2400 CL16 vs Kingston FURY Impact DDR4-3200 SODIMM 2x16GB
On true latency Kingston FURY Impact DDR4-3200 SODIMM 2x16GB comes out ahead: 12.50 ns, where Corsair Vengeance DDR4-3200 SODIMM 2x16GB 2400 CL16 takes 13.33 ns. The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so what follows compares specifications alone.
| Specification | CorsairVengeance DDR4-3200 SODIMM 2x16GB 2400 CL16 | KingstonFURY Impact DDR4-3200 SODIMM 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 2400 | 3200better |
| 16 | 20 | |
| True latency (ns) | 13.33 | 12.50better |
| Current best price | — | 249,00 €at Amazon.de · captured 2026-09-02 |
| Price per GB | — | 7,78 € |
No tracked price for Corsair Vengeance DDR4-3200 SODIMM 2x16GB 2400 CL16 at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Corsair Vengeance DDR4-3200 SODIMM 2x16GB 2400 CL16 vs Kingston FURY Impact DDR4-3200 SODIMM 2x16GB in detail
True latency
Kingston FURY Impact DDR4-3200 SODIMM 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 12.50 ns, against 13.33 ns for Corsair Vengeance DDR4-3200 SODIMM 2x16GB 2400 CL16 — a difference of 0.83 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. Corsair Vengeance DDR4-3200 SODIMM 2x16GB 2400 CL16 runs 2400 MT/s at CL16; Kingston FURY Impact DDR4-3200 SODIMM 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL20.
Transfer rate
Kingston FURY Impact DDR4-3200 SODIMM 2x16GB is rated 3200 MT/s against 2400 MT/s for Corsair Vengeance DDR4-3200 SODIMM 2x16GB 2400 CL16 — 25600 MB/s per module, against 19200 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
Corsair Vengeance DDR4-3200 SODIMM 2x16GB 2400 CL16 ships as 2 × 16GB, Kingston FURY Impact DDR4-3200 SODIMM 2x16GB ships as 1 × 32GB. That is a real difference and not a ranking: more sticks fill more channels on a board that has them, while fewer sticks leave slots free for a later addition. Which suits depends on the board and on whether more memory is planned.
Lighting and timings
On the lighting question: Corsair Vengeance DDR4-3200 SODIMM 2x16GB 2400 CL16 does not have RGB lighting, and Kingston FURY Impact DDR4-3200 SODIMM 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: Corsair Vengeance DDR4-3200 SODIMM 2x16GB 2400 CL16 runs 22-22-22-53, and Kingston FURY Impact DDR4-3200 SODIMM 2x16GB does not publish one.
Which to buy
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, Kingston FURY Impact DDR4-3200 SODIMM 2x16GB is the quicker at 12.50 ns of true latency.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Corsair Vengeance DDR4-3200 SODIMM 2x16GB 2400 CL16 faster than Kingston FURY Impact DDR4-3200 SODIMM 2x16GB?
- Kingston FURY Impact DDR4-3200 SODIMM 2x16GB is, on true latency: 12.50 ns against 13.33 ns. Corsair Vengeance DDR4-3200 SODIMM 2x16GB 2400 CL16 runs 2400 MT/s at CL16 and Kingston FURY Impact DDR4-3200 SODIMM 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL20; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, Kingston FURY Impact DDR4-3200 SODIMM 2x16GB is the quicker at 12.50 ns of true latency.