Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5600 2x32GB vs G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-5200 2x32GB
14.29 ns of true latency for Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5600 2x32GB against 15.38 ns for G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-5200 2x32GB, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. At least one of the two has no tracked price right now, so what follows compares specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | CorsairVengeance DDR5-5600 2x32GB | G.SkillRipjaws S5 DDR5-5200 2x32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 64 | 64 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 5600better | 5200 |
| 40 | 40 | |
| True latency (ns) | 14.29better | 15.38 |
| Current best price | 806,62 €at Amazon.de · captured 2026-09-13 | — |
| Price per GB | 12,60 € | — |
No tracked price for G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-5200 2x32GB at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5600 2x32GB vs G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-5200 2x32GB in detail
True latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5600 2x32GB is the lower-latency kit at 14.29 ns against 15.38 ns for G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-5200 2x32GB, 1.10 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5600 2x32GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL40; G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-5200 2x32GB runs 5200 MT/s at CL40.
Transfer rate
Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5600 2x32GB carries the higher rating, 5600 MT/s to 5200 MT/s for G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-5200 2x32GB — 44800 MB/s per module against 41600 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time. Both kits are published at CL40, so an identical count of cycles simply completes sooner at the higher clock, and the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5600 2x32GB ships as 2 × 32GB and G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-5200 2x32GB ships as 2 × 32GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Lighting and timings
On lighting: Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5600 2x32GB is published with no RGB lighting, and G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-5200 2x32GB is published with no RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5600 2x32GB is 40-40-40-77, and G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-5200 2x32GB publishes none.
Which to buy
Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5600 2x32GB has the lower true latency, 14.29 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5600 2x32GB faster than G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-5200 2x32GB?
- Yes, on true latency: 14.29 ns for Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5600 2x32GB against 15.38 ns for G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-5200 2x32GB. Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5600 2x32GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL40 and G.Skill Ripjaws S5 DDR5-5200 2x32GB runs 5200 MT/s at CL40, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5600 2x32GB has the lower true latency, 14.29 ns.