Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB vs G.Skill Ripjaws M5 RGB DDR5-5200 2x32GB
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB has the lower true latency of the two at 10.00 ns, against 15.38 ns for G.Skill Ripjaws M5 RGB DDR5-5200 2x32GB. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | CorsairVengeance RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB | G.SkillRipjaws M5 RGB DDR5-5200 2x32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 64 | 64 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6400better | 5200 |
| 32 | 40 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00better | 15.38 |
| Current best price | 1.099,99 €at Amazon.de · captured 2026-09-13 | — |
| Price per GB | 17,19 € | — |
No tracked price for G.Skill Ripjaws M5 RGB DDR5-5200 2x32GB at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB vs G.Skill Ripjaws M5 RGB DDR5-5200 2x32GB in detail
True latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB is the lower-latency kit at 10.00 ns, against 15.38 ns for G.Skill Ripjaws M5 RGB DDR5-5200 2x32GB — a difference of 5.38 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32; G.Skill Ripjaws M5 RGB DDR5-5200 2x32GB runs 5200 MT/s at CL40.
Transfer rate
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB is rated 6400 MT/s against 5200 MT/s for G.Skill Ripjaws M5 RGB DDR5-5200 2x32GB — 51200 MB/s per module, against 41600 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB ships as 2 × 32GB and G.Skill Ripjaws M5 RGB DDR5-5200 2x32GB ships as 2 × 32GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Lighting and timings
On the lighting question: Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB is published with RGB lighting, and G.Skill Ripjaws M5 RGB DDR5-5200 2x32GB is published with RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB runs 32-40-40-84, and G.Skill Ripjaws M5 RGB DDR5-5200 2x32GB does not publish one.
Which to buy
At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give: which is worth more depends on what each costs, and that is exactly what is missing. On specifications alone, Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB has the lower true latency at 10.00 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB faster than G.Skill Ripjaws M5 RGB DDR5-5200 2x32GB?
- Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB is, on true latency: 10.00 ns against 15.38 ns. Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32 and G.Skill Ripjaws M5 RGB DDR5-5200 2x32GB runs 5200 MT/s at CL40; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give: which is worth more depends on what each costs, and that is exactly what is missing. On specifications alone, Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6400 2x32GB has the lower true latency at 10.00 ns.