Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6800 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32
On true latency TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 comes out ahead: 10.00 ns, where Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6800 2x16GB takes 11.77 ns. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | CorsairVengeance RGB DDR5-6800 2x16GB | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6800better | 6400 |
| 40 | 32 | |
| True latency (ns) | 11.77 | 10.00better |
| Current best price | — | 566,24 €at Amazon.de · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | — | 17,70 € |
No tracked price for Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6800 2x16GB at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6800 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is the lower-latency kit at 10.00 ns against 11.77 ns for Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6800 2x16GB, 1.76 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6800 2x16GB runs 6800 MT/s at CL40; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 runs 6400 MT/s at CL32.
Transfer rate
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6800 2x16GB carries the higher rating, 6800 MT/s to 6400 MT/s for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 — 54400 MB/s per module against 51200 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6800 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Lighting and timings
On lighting: Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6800 2x16GB has RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 has RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6800 2x16GB publishes none, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is 32-39-39-102.
Which to buy
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is the quicker at 10.00 ns of true latency.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6800 2x16GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32?
- Yes, on true latency: 10.00 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 against 11.77 ns for Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6800 2x16GB. Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6800 2x16GB runs 6800 MT/s at CL40 and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 runs 6400 MT/s at CL32, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is the quicker at 10.00 ns of true latency.