G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 vs TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB
G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 has the lower true latency of the two at 9.33 ns, against 10.63 ns for TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | G.SKILLFlare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 | TeamGroupT-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 64 | 64 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6000 | 6400better |
| 28 | 34 | |
| True latency (ns) | 9.33better | 10.63 |
| Current best price | 2.306,28 €at Amazon.de · captured 2026-09-15 | — |
| Price per GB | 36,04 € | — |
No tracked price for TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 vs TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB in detail
True latency
G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 is the lower-latency kit at 9.33 ns against 10.63 ns for TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB, 1.29 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28; TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL34.
Transfer rate
TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB carries the higher rating, 6400 MT/s to 6000 MT/s for G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 — 51200 MB/s per module against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 ships as 2 × 32GB and TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB ships as 2 × 32GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Lighting, timings and ECC
On lighting: G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 is published with no RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB is published with no RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 is 30-38-38-96, and TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB publishes none. On error correction: G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 is published without ECC, and the catalog does not state whether TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB has it. ECC is a board and CPU feature as much as a module one, so it is worth having only where the platform can use it.
Which to buy
Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 has the lower true latency, 9.33 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 faster than TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB?
- Yes, on true latency: 9.33 ns for G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 against 10.63 ns for TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB. G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28 and TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL34, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 has the lower true latency, 9.33 ns.