G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB vs TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB
10.00 ns of true latency for G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB against 10.63 ns for TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | G.SKILLFlare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB | TeamGroupT-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 64 | 64 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6000 | 6400better |
| 30 | 34 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00better | 10.63 |
| Current best price | 1.183,00 €at Amazon.de · captured 2026-09-04 | — |
| Price per GB | 18,48 € | — |
No tracked price for TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB vs TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB in detail
True latency
G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB is the lower-latency kit at 10.00 ns against 10.63 ns for TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB, 0.63 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL30; TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL34.
Transfer rate
TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB carries the higher rating, 6400 MT/s to 6000 MT/s for G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB — 51200 MB/s per module against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB ships as 2 × 32GB and TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB ships as 2 × 32GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Lighting, timings and ECC
On lighting: G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB is published with no RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB is published with no RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB is 30-40-40-96, and TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB publishes none. On error correction: G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB is published without ECC, and the catalog does not state whether TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB has it. ECC is a board and CPU feature as much as a module one, so it is worth having only where the platform can use it.
Which to buy
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB is the quicker at 10.00 ns of true latency.
Common questions about this pair
- Is G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB faster than TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB?
- Yes, on true latency: 10.00 ns for G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB against 10.63 ns for TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB. G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL30 and TeamGroup T-Create Expert DDR5-6400 2x32GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL34, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 2x32GB is the quicker at 10.00 ns of true latency.