KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28
KLEVVFIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB32 GB · 6000 MT/s · 30 CL · 10.00 nsTeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 has the lower true latency of the two at 9.33 ns, against 10.00 ns for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB. At least one of the two has no tracked price right now, so what follows compares specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | KLEVVFIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6000 | 6000 |
| 30 | 28 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00 | 9.33better |
| Current best price | 488,95 €at Amazon.de · captured 2026-09-24 | — |
| Price per GB | 15,28 € | — |
No tracked price for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is the lower-latency kit at 9.33 ns, against 10.00 ns for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB — a difference of 0.67 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL30; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28.
Transfer rate
Both kits are rated 6000 MT/s, which is 48000 MB/s per module. Their spec sheets part company on CAS latency rather than on clock, so the true-latency figures above are what separates them.
Kit layout
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Voltage
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB is specified at 1.35 V and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 at 1.4 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile asks the board for.
Lighting and timings
On the lighting question: KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is published with RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 30-36-36-76, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 does not publish one.
Which to buy
Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 has the lower true latency, 9.33 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28?
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is, on true latency: 9.33 ns against 10.00 ns. KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL30 and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 has the lower true latency, 9.33 ns.