Lexar THOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32

LexarTHOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB32 GB · 6000 MT/s · 38 CL · 12.67 nsLeads on Current best price
TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL3232 GB · 6400 MT/s · 32 CL · 10.00 nsLeads on Speed
In short

TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 has the lower true latency of the two at 10.00 ns, against 12.67 ns for Lexar THOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB. The lower tracked price belongs to Lexar THOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB, which leaves each kit ahead on one axis and neither ahead on both.

SpecificationLexarTHOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GBTeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32
Capacity (GB)3232
Speed (MT/s)60006400better
3832
True latency (ns)12.6710.00better
Current best price545,66 €betterat Amazon.de · captured 2026-09-13566,24 €at Amazon.de · captured 2026-09-13
Price per GB17,05 €better17,70 €

Lexar THOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 in detail

True latency

TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is the lower-latency kit at 10.00 ns, against 12.67 ns for Lexar THOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB — a difference of 2.67 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. Lexar THOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL38; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 runs 6400 MT/s at CL32.

Transfer rate

TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is rated 6400 MT/s against 6000 MT/s for Lexar THOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB — 51200 MB/s per module, against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.

Price and tracked history

Lexar THOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB is tracked at 545,66 € — 17,05 € per gigabyte — and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 at 566,24 €, or 17,70 €. Both are 32GB kits, so the totals compare directly: Lexar THOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB is 20,58 € less than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32. At 566,24 €, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is running 20% below its own 90-day median.

Kit layout

Lexar THOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.

Lighting and timings

On the lighting question: Lexar THOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB is published with RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is published with RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: Lexar THOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 38-48-48-96, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 runs 32-39-39-102.

Which to buy

Neither of these leads outright, so there is no single answer to give. Lexar THOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB costs less at the prices tracked here; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 has the lower true latency, 10.00 ns against 12.67 ns. Which of those two is worth more is a judgement about the machine and the budget, and this page does not make it for a reader.

Common questions about this pair

Is Lexar THOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32?
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 is, on true latency: 10.00 ns against 12.67 ns. Lexar THOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL38 and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 runs 6400 MT/s at CL32; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
Which one costs less?
Lexar THOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB, at 545,66 € against 566,24 € — 20,58 € apart at the same 32GB.
Which of these two should I buy?
Neither of these leads outright, so there is no single answer to give. Lexar THOR Z RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB costs less at the prices tracked here; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB CL32 has the lower true latency, 10.00 ns against 12.67 ns. Which of those two is worth more is a judgement about the machine and the budget, and this page does not make it for a reader.
How we track prices

Related comparisons