Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB
Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 has the lower true latency of the two at 9.27 ns, against 9.44 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB. TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB is tracked at the lower price, so the two split the axes this page measures, one each.
| Specification | PatriotViper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 8200better | 7200 |
| 38 | 34 | |
| True latency (ns) | 9.27better | 9.44 |
| Current best price | 802,02 €at Amazon.de · captured 2026-09-13 | 543,92 €betterat Amazon.de · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | 25,06 € | 17,00 €better |
Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB in detail
True latency
Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 is the lower-latency kit at 9.27 ns against 9.44 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB, 0.18 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 runs 8200 MT/s at CL38; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB runs 7200 MT/s at CL34.
Transfer rate
Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 carries the higher rating, 8200 MT/s to 7200 MT/s for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB — 65600 MB/s per module against 57600 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Price and tracked history
Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 is tracked at 802,02 €, or 25,06 € per gigabyte; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB at 543,92 €, or 17,00 €. At the same 32GB, that puts TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB 258,10 € less than Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38. Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38's 802,02 € sits 0% under its own 90-day median. TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB's 543,92 € sits 23% under its own 90-day median.
Kit layout
Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Lighting
On lighting: Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 is published with no RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB has RGB lighting.
Which to buy
Neither of these leads outright, so there is no single answer to give. TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB costs less at the prices tracked here; Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 has the lower true latency, 9.27 ns against 9.44 ns. Which of those two is worth more is a judgement about the machine and the budget, and this page does not make it for a reader.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB?
- Yes, on true latency: 9.27 ns for Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 against 9.44 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB. Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 runs 8200 MT/s at CL38 and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB runs 7200 MT/s at CL34, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which one costs less?
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB, tracked at 543,92 € against 802,02 €: 258,10 € between them at the same 32GB.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Neither of these leads outright, so there is no single answer to give. TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB costs less at the prices tracked here; Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 has the lower true latency, 9.27 ns against 9.44 ns. Which of those two is worth more is a judgement about the machine and the budget, and this page does not make it for a reader.