Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 vs TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Alpha DDR5-5600 2x16GB
Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 has the lower true latency of the two at 12.00 ns, against 14.29 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Alpha DDR5-5600 2x16GB. The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so what follows compares specifications alone.
| Specification | Silicon PowerValue Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 | TeamGroupT-Force Vulcan Alpha DDR5-5600 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6000better | 5600 |
| 36 | 40 | |
| True latency (ns) | 12.00better | 14.29 |
| Current best price | — | — |
| Price per GB | — | — |
Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 vs TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Alpha DDR5-5600 2x16GB in detail
True latency
Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 is the lower-latency kit at 12.00 ns, against 14.29 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Alpha DDR5-5600 2x16GB — a difference of 2.29 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 runs 6000 MT/s at CL36; TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Alpha DDR5-5600 2x16GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL40.
Transfer rate
Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 is rated 6000 MT/s against 5600 MT/s for TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Alpha DDR5-5600 2x16GB — 48000 MB/s per module, against 44800 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Alpha DDR5-5600 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Lighting and timings
On the lighting question: Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 does not have RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Alpha DDR5-5600 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 runs 30-38-38-96, and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Alpha DDR5-5600 2x16GB does not publish one.
Which to buy
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 is the quicker at 12.00 ns of true latency.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 faster than TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Alpha DDR5-5600 2x16GB?
- Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 is, on true latency: 12.00 ns against 14.29 ns. Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 runs 6000 MT/s at CL36 and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Alpha DDR5-5600 2x16GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL40; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 is the quicker at 12.00 ns of true latency.