A-Tech 32GB DDR4-3200 UDIMM Kit 16GB Kit (2x8GB) vs Kingston ValueRAM DDR4-3200 1x16GB
A-Tech 32GB DDR4-3200 UDIMM Kit 16GB Kit (2x8GB) and Kingston ValueRAM DDR4-3200 1x16GB arrive at the same true latency, 13.75 ns apiece. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | A-Tech32GB DDR4-3200 UDIMM Kit 16GB Kit (2x8GB) | KingstonValueRAM DDR4-3200 1x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 16 | 16 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 3200 | 3200 |
| 22 | 22 | |
| True latency (ns) | 13.75 | 13.75 |
| Current best price | — | 166,44 €at Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | — | 10,40 € |
No tracked price for A-Tech 32GB DDR4-3200 UDIMM Kit 16GB Kit (2x8GB) at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
A-Tech 32GB DDR4-3200 UDIMM Kit 16GB Kit (2x8GB) vs Kingston ValueRAM DDR4-3200 1x16GB in detail
True latency
Both kits land on 13.75 ns. The two spec sheets state the same clock and the same CAS grade — 3200 MT/s at CL22 either way — and true latency is those two figures reconciled, so it comes out the same for each.
Transfer rate
Both kits are rated 3200 MT/s — 25600 MB/s per module — and both are published at CL22. The true latency above is computed from exactly those two figures, so it lands in the same place for each.
Kit layout
A-Tech 32GB DDR4-3200 UDIMM Kit 16GB Kit (2x8GB) ships as 2 × 8GB, Kingston ValueRAM DDR4-3200 1x16GB ships as 1 × 16GB. That is a real difference and not a ranking: more sticks fill more channels on a board that has them, while fewer sticks leave slots free for a later addition. Which suits depends on the board and on whether more memory is planned.
Lighting, timings and ECC
On the lighting question: A-Tech 32GB DDR4-3200 UDIMM Kit 16GB Kit (2x8GB) does not have RGB lighting, and Kingston ValueRAM DDR4-3200 1x16GB does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: A-Tech 32GB DDR4-3200 UDIMM Kit 16GB Kit (2x8GB) does not publish one, and Kingston ValueRAM DDR4-3200 1x16GB runs 22-22-22. On error correction: A-Tech 32GB DDR4-3200 UDIMM Kit 16GB Kit (2x8GB) is published with no ECC, and Kingston ValueRAM DDR4-3200 1x16GB is published with no ECC. Whether ECC is worth having depends on the platform as much as the modules — the board and the CPU have to support it too.
Which to buy
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so there is no buying answer here; the specifications do not settle it either, since both reconcile to 13.75 ns of true latency. The sections above are what is left to choose on.
Common questions about this pair
- Is A-Tech 32GB DDR4-3200 UDIMM Kit 16GB Kit (2x8GB) faster than Kingston ValueRAM DDR4-3200 1x16GB?
- Neither. Both come out at 13.75 ns of true latency: A-Tech 32GB DDR4-3200 UDIMM Kit 16GB Kit (2x8GB) runs 3200 MT/s at CL22 and Kingston ValueRAM DDR4-3200 1x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL22, and the two reconcile to one figure.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so there is no buying answer here; the specifications do not settle it either, since both reconcile to 13.75 ns of true latency. The sections above are what is left to choose on.