ADATA XPG Gammix D10 DDR4-3200 2x16GB 3600 CL18 vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3200 2x16GB
ADATA XPG Gammix D10 DDR4-3200 2x16GB 3600 CL18 and Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3200 2x16GB arrive at the same true latency, 10.00 ns apiece. At least one of the two has no tracked price right now, so what follows compares specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | ADATAXPG Gammix D10 DDR4-3200 2x16GB 3600 CL18 | CorsairVengeance LPX DDR4-3200 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 3600better | 3200 |
| 18 | 16 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00 | 10.00 |
| Current best price | — | 209,99 €at Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | — | 6,56 € |
No tracked price for ADATA XPG Gammix D10 DDR4-3200 2x16GB 3600 CL18 at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
ADATA XPG Gammix D10 DDR4-3200 2x16GB 3600 CL18 vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3200 2x16GB in detail
True latency
Both kits land on 10.00 ns by different routes: ADATA XPG Gammix D10 DDR4-3200 2x16GB 3600 CL18 at 3600 MT/s at CL18, Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3200 2x16GB at 3200 MT/s at CL16. A CAS number counts cycles rather than time, so a higher clock absorbs a looser one and the two arrive together — which is why these spec sheets look different and the memory does not.
Transfer rate
ADATA XPG Gammix D10 DDR4-3200 2x16GB 3600 CL18 is rated 3600 MT/s against 3200 MT/s for Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3200 2x16GB — 28800 MB/s per module, against 25600 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
ADATA XPG Gammix D10 DDR4-3200 2x16GB 3600 CL18 ships as 2 × 16GB and Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3200 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Lighting, timings and ECC
On the lighting question: ADATA XPG Gammix D10 DDR4-3200 2x16GB 3600 CL18 does not have RGB lighting, and Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3200 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: ADATA XPG Gammix D10 DDR4-3200 2x16GB 3600 CL18 runs 16-18-18, and Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3200 2x16GB runs 16-20-20-38. On error correction: ADATA XPG Gammix D10 DDR4-3200 2x16GB 3600 CL18 is published with no ECC, and Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3200 2x16GB is published with no ECC. Whether ECC is worth having depends on the platform as much as the modules — the board and the CPU have to support it too.
Which to buy
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so there is no buying answer here; the specifications do not settle it either, since both reconcile to 10.00 ns of true latency. The sections above are what is left to choose on.
Common questions about this pair
- Is ADATA XPG Gammix D10 DDR4-3200 2x16GB 3600 CL18 faster than Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3200 2x16GB?
- Neither. Both come out at 10.00 ns of true latency: ADATA XPG Gammix D10 DDR4-3200 2x16GB 3600 CL18 runs 3600 MT/s at CL18 and Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3200 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16, and the two reconcile to one figure.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so there is no buying answer here; the specifications do not settle it either, since both reconcile to 10.00 ns of true latency. The sections above are what is left to choose on.