ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB vs ADATA XPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB and ADATA XPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB arrive at the same true latency, 10.00 ns apiece. The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so what follows compares specifications alone.
| Specification | ADATAXPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB | ADATAXPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6400better | 6000 |
| 32 | 30 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00 | 10.00 |
| Current best price | 639,00 €at Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-11 | — |
| Price per GB | 19,97 € | — |
No tracked price for ADATA XPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB vs ADATA XPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB in detail
True latency
Both kits land on 10.00 ns. ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB gets there at 6400 MT/s at CL32, ADATA XPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB at 6000 MT/s at CL30. CAS latency counts clock cycles rather than time, so a higher clock paired with a looser CAS number arrives at the same place — which is why these two spec sheets look different and the memory does not.
Transfer rate
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB carries the higher rating, 6400 MT/s to 6000 MT/s for ADATA XPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB — 51200 MB/s per module against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and ADATA XPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Lighting and timings
On lighting: ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB has RGB lighting, and ADATA XPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB has RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is 32-39-39, and ADATA XPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB is 30-40-40.
Which to buy
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so there is no buying answer here; the specifications do not settle it either, since both reconcile to 10.00 ns of true latency. The sections above are what is left to choose on.
Common questions about this pair
- Is ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB faster than ADATA XPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB?
- Neither is. Both work out at 10.00 ns of true latency — ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32, ADATA XPG Lancer RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL30, and those two land in the same place.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so there is no buying answer here; the specifications do not settle it either, since both reconcile to 10.00 ns of true latency. The sections above are what is left to choose on.