ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB vs G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB and G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB arrive at the same true latency, 10.00 ns apiece. Neither is quicker than the other; G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is simply tracked at the lower price, and that is the whole of it.
| Specification | ADATAXPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB | G.SKILLTrident Z5 RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6400 | 6400 |
| 32 | 32 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00 | 10.00 |
| Current best price | 639,00 €at Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-11 | 585,35 €betterat Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | 19,97 € | 18,29 €better |
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB vs G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB in detail
True latency
Both kits land on 10.00 ns. The two spec sheets state the same clock and the same CAS grade — 6400 MT/s at CL32 either way — and true latency is those two figures reconciled, so it comes out the same for each.
Transfer rate
Both kits are rated 6400 MT/s — 51200 MB/s per module — and both are published at CL32. The true latency above is computed from exactly those two figures, so it lands in the same place for each.
Price and tracked history
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is tracked at 639,00 € — 19,97 € per gigabyte — and G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB at 585,35 €, or 18,29 €. Both are 32GB kits, so the totals compare directly: G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is 53,65 € less than ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB. 639,00 € is the lowest price this site has recorded for ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB. At 585,35 €, G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is running 17% below its own 90-day median.
Kit layout
ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Lighting and timings
On the lighting question: ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is published with RGB lighting, and G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB is published with RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 32-39-39, and G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 32-39-39-102.
Which to buy
G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB leads on price alone. The two reconcile to the same 10.00 ns of true latency, so what separates them is only what this site has tracked them at. Cheaper, then, and not faster; this page claims nothing more.
Common questions about this pair
- Is ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB faster than G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB?
- Neither. Both come out at 10.00 ns of true latency: ADATA XPG Lancer Blade RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32 and G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32, and the two reconcile to one figure.
- Which one costs less?
- G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB, at 585,35 € against 639,00 € — 53,65 € apart at the same 32GB.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6400 2x16GB leads on price alone. The two reconcile to the same 10.00 ns of true latency, so what separates them is only what this site has tracked them at. Cheaper, then, and not faster; this page claims nothing more.