ADATA XPG Lancer NEON RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB
On true latency TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB comes out ahead: 9.44 ns, where ADATA XPG Lancer NEON RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB takes 9.50 ns. The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so what follows compares specifications alone.
| Specification | ADATAXPG Lancer NEON RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 8000better | 7200 |
| 38 | 34 | |
| True latency (ns) | 9.50 | 9.44better |
| Current best price | 691,74 €at Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-13 | — |
| Price per GB | 21,62 € | — |
No tracked price for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
ADATA XPG Lancer NEON RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 9.44 ns, against 9.50 ns for ADATA XPG Lancer NEON RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB — a difference of 0.06 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. ADATA XPG Lancer NEON RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB runs 8000 MT/s at CL38; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB runs 7200 MT/s at CL34.
Transfer rate
ADATA XPG Lancer NEON RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB is rated 8000 MT/s against 7200 MT/s for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB — 64000 MB/s per module, against 57600 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
ADATA XPG Lancer NEON RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Voltage
ADATA XPG Lancer NEON RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB is specified at 1.45 V and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB at 1.4 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile asks the board for.
Lighting
On the lighting question: ADATA XPG Lancer NEON RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB is published with RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB is published with RGB lighting.
Which to buy
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB is the quicker at 9.44 ns of true latency.
Common questions about this pair
- Is ADATA XPG Lancer NEON RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB?
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB is, on true latency: 9.44 ns against 9.50 ns. ADATA XPG Lancer NEON RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB runs 8000 MT/s at CL38 and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB runs 7200 MT/s at CL34; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-7200 2x16GB is the quicker at 9.44 ns of true latency.