Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB vs G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28
9.33 ns of true latency for G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 against 9.70 ns for Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so what follows compares specifications alone.
| Specification | CorsairDominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB | G.SKILLTrident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 64 | 64 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6600better | 6000 |
| 32 | 28 | |
| True latency (ns) | 9.70 | 9.33better |
| Current best price | 1211,72 €at Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-13 | — |
| Price per GB | 18,93 € | — |
No tracked price for G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB vs G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 in detail
True latency
G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 is the lower-latency kit at 9.33 ns against 9.70 ns for Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB, 0.36 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB runs 6600 MT/s at CL32; G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28.
Transfer rate
Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB carries the higher rating, 6600 MT/s to 6000 MT/s for G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 — 52800 MB/s per module against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB ships as 2 × 32GB and G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 ships as 2 × 32GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Voltage
Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB is specified at 1.4 V and G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 at 1.35 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile requests from the board.
Lighting, timings and ECC
On lighting: Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB has RGB lighting, and G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 has RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB is 32-39-39-76, and G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 is 30-40-40-96. On error correction: Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB is published without ECC, and the catalog does not state whether G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 has it. ECC is a board and CPU feature as much as a module one, so it is worth having only where the platform can use it.
Which to buy
Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 has the lower true latency, 9.33 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB faster than G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28?
- Yes, on true latency: 9.33 ns for G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 against 9.70 ns for Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB. Corsair Dominator Titanium RGB DDR5-6600 2x32GB runs 6600 MT/s at CL32 and G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x32GB CL28 has the lower true latency, 9.33 ns.