Corsair Vengeance DDR5-7000 2x48GB vs G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL28
On true latency G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL28 comes out ahead: 9.33 ns, where Corsair Vengeance DDR5-7000 2x48GB takes 9.71 ns. The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so what follows compares specifications alone.
| Specification | CorsairVengeance DDR5-7000 2x48GB | G.SKILLTrident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL28 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 96 | 96 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 7000better | 6000 |
| 34 | 28 | |
| True latency (ns) | 9.71 | 9.33better |
| Current best price | — | 2051,36 €at Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-02 |
| Price per GB | — | 21,37 € |
No tracked price for Corsair Vengeance DDR5-7000 2x48GB at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Corsair Vengeance DDR5-7000 2x48GB vs G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL28 in detail
True latency
G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL28 is the lower-latency kit at 9.33 ns, against 9.71 ns for Corsair Vengeance DDR5-7000 2x48GB — a difference of 0.38 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. Corsair Vengeance DDR5-7000 2x48GB runs 7000 MT/s at CL34; G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28.
Transfer rate
Corsair Vengeance DDR5-7000 2x48GB is rated 7000 MT/s against 6000 MT/s for G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL28 — 56000 MB/s per module, against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
Corsair Vengeance DDR5-7000 2x48GB ships as 2 × 48GB and G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL28 ships as 2 × 48GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Lighting, timings and ECC
On the lighting question: Corsair Vengeance DDR5-7000 2x48GB does not have RGB lighting, and G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL28 is published with RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: Corsair Vengeance DDR5-7000 2x48GB does not publish one, and G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL28 runs 28-36-36-96. On error correction: the catalog does not state whether Corsair Vengeance DDR5-7000 2x48GB supports it, and G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL28 is published with no ECC. Whether ECC is worth having depends on the platform as much as the modules — the board and the CPU have to support it too.
Which to buy
Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL28 has the lower true latency, 9.33 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Corsair Vengeance DDR5-7000 2x48GB faster than G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL28?
- G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL28 is, on true latency: 9.33 ns against 9.71 ns. Corsair Vengeance DDR5-7000 2x48GB runs 7000 MT/s at CL34 and G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 2x48GB CL28 has the lower true latency, 9.33 ns.