Corsair Vengeance DDR5-7200 2x16GB vs KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28
On true latency KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 comes out ahead: 9.33 ns, where Corsair Vengeance DDR5-7200 2x16GB takes 9.44 ns. On top of the latency, KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 carries the lower tracked price, so both measured axes point the same way.
| Specification | CorsairVengeance DDR5-7200 2x16GB | KLEVVFIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 7200better | 6000 |
| 34 | 28 | |
| True latency (ns) | 9.44 | 9.33better |
| Current best price | 694,42 €at Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-13 | 467,94 €betterat Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-04 |
| Price per GB | 21,70 € | 14,62 €better |
Corsair Vengeance DDR5-7200 2x16GB vs KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 in detail
True latency
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is the lower-latency kit at 9.33 ns against 9.44 ns for Corsair Vengeance DDR5-7200 2x16GB, 0.11 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. Corsair Vengeance DDR5-7200 2x16GB runs 7200 MT/s at CL34; KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28.
Transfer rate
Corsair Vengeance DDR5-7200 2x16GB carries the higher rating, 7200 MT/s to 6000 MT/s for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 — 57600 MB/s per module against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Price and tracked history
Corsair Vengeance DDR5-7200 2x16GB is tracked at 694,42 €, or 21,70 € per gigabyte; KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 at 467,94 €, or 14,62 €. At the same 32GB, that puts KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 226,48 € less than Corsair Vengeance DDR5-7200 2x16GB. Corsair Vengeance DDR5-7200 2x16GB's 694,42 € sits 23% under its own 90-day median. KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28's 467,94 € sits 7% under its own 90-day median.
Kit layout
Corsair Vengeance DDR5-7200 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Lighting and timings
On lighting: Corsair Vengeance DDR5-7200 2x16GB is published with no RGB lighting, and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is published with no RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — Corsair Vengeance DDR5-7200 2x16GB publishes none, and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is 28-36-36-76.
Which to buy
Both axes this page measures point to KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28: 9.33 ns of true latency against 9.44 ns, and the lower of the two tracked prices.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Corsair Vengeance DDR5-7200 2x16GB faster than KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28?
- Yes, on true latency: 9.33 ns for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 against 9.44 ns for Corsair Vengeance DDR5-7200 2x16GB. Corsair Vengeance DDR5-7200 2x16GB runs 7200 MT/s at CL34 and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which one costs less?
- KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28, tracked at 467,94 € against 694,42 €: 226,48 € between them at the same 32GB.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Both axes this page measures point to KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28: 9.33 ns of true latency against 9.44 ns, and the lower of the two tracked prices.