Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB vs KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 has the lower true latency of the two at 9.33 ns, against 15.38 ns for Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB. Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB is tracked at the lower price, so the two split the axes this page measures, one each.
| Specification | CorsairVengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB | KLEVVFIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 5200 | 6000better |
| 40 | 28 | |
| True latency (ns) | 15.38 | 9.33better |
| Current best price | 389,99 €betterat Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-11 | 467,94 €at Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-04 |
| Price per GB | 12,19 €better | 14,62 € |
Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB vs KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 in detail
True latency
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is the lower-latency kit at 9.33 ns against 15.38 ns for Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB, 6.05 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB runs 5200 MT/s at CL40; KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28.
Transfer rate
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 carries the higher rating, 6000 MT/s to 5200 MT/s for Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB — 48000 MB/s per module against 41600 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Price and tracked history
Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB is tracked at 389,99 €, or 12,19 € per gigabyte; KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 at 467,94 €, or 14,62 €. At the same 32GB, that puts Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB 77,95 € less than KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28. 389,99 € is the lowest this site has ever recorded for Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB. KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28's 467,94 € sits 7% under its own 90-day median.
Kit layout
Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Voltage
Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB is specified at 1.25 V and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 at 1.35 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile requests from the board.
Lighting and timings
On lighting: Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB has RGB lighting, and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is published with no RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB is 40-40-40-77, and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is 28-36-36-76.
Which to buy
There is no single answer here, because each kit leads on one axis. Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB is the cheaper at the prices tracked here, and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 the quicker on true latency at 9.33 ns against 15.38 ns. Which matters more depends on the build and the budget, and that is not a call this page can make.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB faster than KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28?
- Yes, on true latency: 9.33 ns for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 against 15.38 ns for Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB. Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB runs 5200 MT/s at CL40 and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which one costs less?
- Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB, tracked at 389,99 € against 467,94 €: 77,95 € between them at the same 32GB.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- There is no single answer here, because each kit leads on one axis. Corsair Vengeance RGB RS DDR5-5200 2x16GB is the cheaper at the prices tracked here, and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 the quicker on true latency at 9.33 ns against 15.38 ns. Which matters more depends on the build and the budget, and that is not a call this page can make.