Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB vs Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB
10.00 ns of true latency for Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB against 13.75 ns for Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. On top of the latency, Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB carries the lower tracked price, so both measured axes point the same way.
| Specification | CrucialDDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB | NetacShadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 3200 | 3200 |
| 22 | 16 | |
| True latency (ns) | 13.75 | 10.00better |
| Current best price | 329,88 €at Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-13 | 208,13 €betterat Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | 10,31 € | 6,50 €better |
Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB vs Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB in detail
True latency
Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 10.00 ns, against 13.75 ns for Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB — a difference of 3.75 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL22; Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16.
Transfer rate
Both kits are rated 3200 MT/s, which is 25600 MB/s per module. Their spec sheets part company on CAS latency rather than on clock, so the true-latency figures above are what separates them.
Price and tracked history
Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB is tracked at 329,88 € — 10,31 € per gigabyte — and Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB at 208,13 €, or 6,50 €. Both are 32GB kits, so the totals compare directly: Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB is 121,75 € less than Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB. At 208,13 €, Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB is running 14% below its own 90-day median.
Kit layout
Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Voltage
Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB is specified at 1.2 V and Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB at 1.35 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile asks the board for.
Lighting, timings and ECC
On the lighting question: Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting, and Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB does not publish one, and Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB runs 16-20-20-40. On error correction: Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB is published with no ECC, and the catalog does not state whether Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB supports it. Whether ECC is worth having depends on the platform as much as the modules — the board and the CPU have to support it too.
Which to buy
Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB leads Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB on both of the axes this page measures: the lower true latency, 10.00 ns against 13.75 ns, and the lower price of the two at what this site has tracked.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB faster than Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB?
- Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB is, on true latency: 10.00 ns against 13.75 ns. Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL22 and Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which one costs less?
- Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB, at 208,13 € against 329,88 € — 121,75 € apart at the same 32GB.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Netac Shadow II DDR4-3200 2x16GB leads Crucial DDR4-3200 Desktop Memory 2x16GB on both of the axes this page measures: the lower true latency, 10.00 ns against 13.75 ns, and the lower price of the two at what this site has tracked.