Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x16GB vs Kingston FURY Impact DDR5-5600 1x32GB 4800 CL38
On true latency Kingston FURY Impact DDR5-5600 1x32GB 4800 CL38 comes out ahead: 15.83 ns, where Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x16GB takes 16.43 ns. The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so what follows compares specifications alone.
| Specification | CrucialDDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x16GB | KingstonFURY Impact DDR5-5600 1x32GB 4800 CL38 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 5600better | 4800 |
| 46 | 38 | |
| True latency (ns) | 16.43 | 15.83better |
| Current best price | — | — |
| Price per GB | — | — |
Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x16GB vs Kingston FURY Impact DDR5-5600 1x32GB 4800 CL38 in detail
True latency
Kingston FURY Impact DDR5-5600 1x32GB 4800 CL38 is the lower-latency kit at 15.83 ns, against 16.43 ns for Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x16GB — a difference of 0.60 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x16GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL46; Kingston FURY Impact DDR5-5600 1x32GB 4800 CL38 runs 4800 MT/s at CL38.
Transfer rate
Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x16GB is rated 5600 MT/s against 4800 MT/s for Kingston FURY Impact DDR5-5600 1x32GB 4800 CL38 — 44800 MB/s per module, against 38400 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and Kingston FURY Impact DDR5-5600 1x32GB 4800 CL38 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Lighting and timings
On the lighting question: Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting, and Kingston FURY Impact DDR5-5600 1x32GB 4800 CL38 does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x16GB does not publish one, and Kingston FURY Impact DDR5-5600 1x32GB 4800 CL38 runs 40-40-40.
Which to buy
Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that Kingston FURY Impact DDR5-5600 1x32GB 4800 CL38 has the lower true latency, 15.83 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x16GB faster than Kingston FURY Impact DDR5-5600 1x32GB 4800 CL38?
- Kingston FURY Impact DDR5-5600 1x32GB 4800 CL38 is, on true latency: 15.83 ns against 16.43 ns. Crucial DDR5-5600 SODIMM 2x16GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL46 and Kingston FURY Impact DDR5-5600 1x32GB 4800 CL38 runs 4800 MT/s at CL38; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that Kingston FURY Impact DDR5-5600 1x32GB 4800 CL38 has the lower true latency, 15.83 ns.