G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB
On true latency TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB comes out ahead: 7.78 ns, where G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB takes 8.89 ns. The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so what follows compares specifications alone.
| Specification | G.SKILLRipjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB | TeamGroupT-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 3600 | 3600 |
| 16 | 14 | |
| True latency (ns) | 8.89 | 7.78better |
| Current best price | 283,79 €at Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-13 | — |
| Price per GB | 8,87 € | — |
No tracked price for TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 7.78 ns, against 8.89 ns for G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB — a difference of 1.11 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 3600 MT/s at CL16; TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 3600 MT/s at CL14.
Transfer rate
Both kits are rated 3600 MT/s, which is 28800 MB/s per module. Their spec sheets part company on CAS latency rather than on clock, so the true-latency figures above are what separates them.
Kit layout
G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Voltage
G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB is specified at 1.35 V and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB at 1.45 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile asks the board for.
Lighting and timings
On the lighting question: G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 16-19-19-39, and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB does not publish one.
Which to buy
Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB has the lower true latency, 7.78 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB?
- TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB is, on true latency: 7.78 ns against 8.89 ns. G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 3600 MT/s at CL16 and TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 3600 MT/s at CL14; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB has the lower true latency, 7.78 ns.