Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB vs KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28
9.33 ns of true latency for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 against 9.50 ns for Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | KingstonFURY Renegade RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB | KLEVVFIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 8000better | 6000 |
| 38 | 28 | |
| True latency (ns) | 9.50 | 9.33better |
| Current best price | — | 467,94 €at Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-04 |
| Price per GB | — | 14,62 € |
No tracked price for Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB vs KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 in detail
True latency
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is the lower-latency kit at 9.33 ns, against 9.50 ns for Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB — a difference of 0.17 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB runs 8000 MT/s at CL38; KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28.
Transfer rate
Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB is rated 8000 MT/s against 6000 MT/s for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 — 64000 MB/s per module, against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Voltage
Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB is specified at 1.45 V and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 at 1.35 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile asks the board for.
Lighting, timings and ECC
On the lighting question: Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB is published with RGB lighting, and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB runs 38-48-48-128, and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 28-36-36-76. On error correction: Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB is published with no ECC, and the catalog does not state whether KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 supports it. Whether ECC is worth having depends on the platform as much as the modules — the board and the CPU have to support it too.
Which to buy
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is the quicker at 9.33 ns of true latency.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB faster than KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28?
- KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is, on true latency: 9.33 ns against 9.50 ns. Kingston FURY Renegade RGB DDR5-8000 2x16GB runs 8000 MT/s at CL38 and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is the quicker at 9.33 ns of true latency.