Skip to main content

Kioxia Exceria Plus G3 1TB vs KLEVV CRAS C910 1TB

KioxiaExceria Plus G3 1TB1000 GB · 5000 MB/s · 3900 MB/s · 600 TBW
KLEVVCRAS C910 1TB1000 GB · 5000 MB/s · 4800 MB/s · 1400 TBWLeads on Sequential write
In short

At least one of these has no price the site currently tracks, so what follows weighs specifications alone.

SpecificationKioxiaExceria Plus G3 1TBKLEVVCRAS C910 1TB
Capacity (GB)10001000
Sequential read (MB/s)50005000
Sequential write (MB/s)39004800better
Current best price180,70 €at Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-12
Price per TB180,70 €
Endurance (TBW)6001400better
Warranty (years)55
DRAM cacheNoNo
NAND typetlctlc
ControllerPhison PS5021-E21T

How these two compare

Sequential throughput

Kioxia Exceria Plus G3 1TB states 5000 MB/s read and 3900 MB/s write; KLEVV CRAS C910 1TB states 5000 MB/s read and 4800 MB/s write, both over PCIe. Sequential numbers like these describe large sustained transfers; the responsiveness you notice day to day tracks random access more closely than the peak figures do.

Random access

Kioxia Exceria Plus G3 1TB is rated 770.000 IOPS random read and 950.000 random write; KLEVV CRAS C910 1TB, 620.000 and 615.000. Random 4K access — many small, scattered operations — is what a drive does booting, launching apps and juggling everyday tasks, and it tracks that feel far more closely than the sequential figures above.

Endurance

Kioxia Exceria Plus G3 1TB is rated for 600 TBW and KLEVV CRAS C910 1TB for 1400 TBW — the total the maker warrants you can write over the drive's life. A typical desktop writes only a few terabytes a year, so either rating is many years of headroom; the figure matters mainly as a relative signal of how hard each is built to be driven.

DRAM cache

On the cache question: Kioxia Exceria Plus G3 1TB is DRAM-less, and KLEVV CRAS C910 1TB is DRAM-less. The DRAM keeps the flash-translation table close, sparing a lookup on nearly every access; a drive without it leans on host memory or its own flash, which usually shows as slower sustained random writes rather than in the headline sequential numbers.

NAND, controller and warranty

On the flash itself: Kioxia Exceria Plus G3 1TB uses TLC, and KLEVV CRAS C910 1TB uses TLC. NAND tiers count bits per cell — more bits pack more capacity into the same silicon but shorten write endurance and slow sustained writes, which is why QLC sits below TLC on lasting performance even when the sequential numbers match. Controller: Kioxia Exceria Plus G3 1TB uses the Phison PS5021-E21T and KLEVV CRAS C910 1TB's controller is not stated. The controller runs wear-levelling, error correction and the mapping table, so it shapes sustained and random behaviour as much as the flash does — though the model name alone predicts little without testing. Kioxia Exceria Plus G3 1TB carries a 5-year warranty and KLEVV CRAS C910 1TB carries a 5-year warranty — the length the maker will stand behind the drive, and usually a proxy for the endurance it is rated to.

Which to buy

The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so it cannot call the buy on cost. Judge them on the specifications above — at the same capacity and interface, two drives usually part on things like the DRAM cache, the NAND tier, endurance and warranty, so weigh whichever of those the sections above report.

Common questions about this pair

Which is faster, Kioxia Exceria Plus G3 1TB or KLEVV CRAS C910 1TB?
Kioxia Exceria Plus G3 1TB states 5000 MB/s read and 3900 MB/s write; KLEVV CRAS C910 1TB states 5000 MB/s read and 4800 MB/s write, both over PCIe. Sequential numbers like these describe large sustained transfers; the responsiveness you notice day to day tracks random access more closely than the peak figures do.
How do Kioxia Exceria Plus G3 1TB and KLEVV CRAS C910 1TB compare on random access?
Kioxia Exceria Plus G3 1TB is rated 770.000 IOPS random read and 950.000 random write; KLEVV CRAS C910 1TB, 620.000 and 615.000. Random 4K access — many small, scattered operations — is what a drive does booting, launching apps and juggling everyday tasks, and it tracks that feel far more closely than the sequential figures above.
Should you buy Kioxia Exceria Plus G3 1TB or KLEVV CRAS C910 1TB?
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so it cannot call the buy on cost. Judge them on the specifications above — at the same capacity and interface, two drives usually part on things like the DRAM cache, the NAND tier, endurance and warranty, so weigh whichever of those the sections above report.
How we track prices

Related comparisons