KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 vs Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-6400 2x16GB
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 has the lower true latency of the two at 9.33 ns, against 10.00 ns for Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-6400 2x16GB. Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-6400 2x16GB is the cheaper of the two at the prices tracked here, so each kit leads on one axis and neither leads on both.
| Specification | KLEVVFIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 | PatriotViper Venom DDR5-6400 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6000 | 6400better |
| 28 | 32 | |
| True latency (ns) | 9.33better | 10.00 |
| Current best price | 467,94 €at Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-04 | 459,99 €betterat Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | 14,62 € | 14,37 €better |
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 vs Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-6400 2x16GB in detail
True latency
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is the lower-latency kit at 9.33 ns, against 10.00 ns for Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-6400 2x16GB — a difference of 0.67 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28; Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32.
Transfer rate
Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-6400 2x16GB is rated 6400 MT/s against 6000 MT/s for KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 — 51200 MB/s per module, against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Price and tracked history
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is tracked at 467,94 € — 14,62 € per gigabyte — and Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-6400 2x16GB at 459,99 €, or 14,37 €. Both are 32GB kits, so the totals compare directly: Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-6400 2x16GB is 7,95 € less than KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28. At 467,94 €, KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is running 7% below its own 90-day median.
Kit layout
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 ships as 2 × 16GB and Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-6400 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Voltage
KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is specified at 1.35 V and Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-6400 2x16GB at 1.4 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile asks the board for.
Lighting and timings
On the lighting question: KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 does not have RGB lighting, and Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-6400 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 28-36-36-76, and Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 32-40-40-84.
Which to buy
There is no single answer here, because each kit leads on one axis. Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-6400 2x16GB is the cheaper at the prices tracked here, and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 the quicker on true latency at 9.33 ns against 10.00 ns. Which matters more depends on the build and the budget, and that is not a call this page can make.
Common questions about this pair
- Is KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 faster than Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-6400 2x16GB?
- KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is, on true latency: 9.33 ns against 10.00 ns. KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28 and Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-6400 2x16GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which one costs less?
- Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-6400 2x16GB, at 459,99 € against 467,94 € — 7,95 € apart at the same 32GB.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- There is no single answer here, because each kit leads on one axis. Patriot Viper Venom DDR5-6400 2x16GB is the cheaper at the prices tracked here, and KLEVV FIT V DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 the quicker on true latency at 9.33 ns against 10.00 ns. Which matters more depends on the build and the budget, and that is not a call this page can make.