PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB vs TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 2x32GB
On true latency TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 2x32GB comes out ahead: 13.75 ns, where PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB takes 14.17 ns. The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so what follows compares specifications alone.
| Specification | PHS-memoryDDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB | TeamGroupElite DDR4-3200 2x32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 64 | 64 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 2400 | 3200better |
| 17 | 22 | |
| True latency (ns) | 14.17 | 13.75better |
| Current best price | — | 651,60 €at Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-02 |
| Price per GB | — | 10,18 € |
No tracked price for PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB vs TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 2x32GB in detail
True latency
TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 2x32GB is the lower-latency kit at 13.75 ns, against 14.17 ns for PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB — a difference of 0.42 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB runs 2400 MT/s at CL17; TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 2x32GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL22.
Transfer rate
TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 2x32GB is rated 3200 MT/s against 2400 MT/s for PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB — 25600 MB/s per module, against 19200 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB ships as 2 × 32GB and TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 2x32GB ships as 2 × 32GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Lighting and ECC
On the lighting question: PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB does not have RGB lighting, and TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 2x32GB does not have RGB lighting. On error correction: the catalog does not state whether PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB supports it, and TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 2x32GB is published with no ECC. Whether ECC is worth having depends on the platform as much as the modules — the board and the CPU have to support it too.
Which to buy
At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give: which is worth more depends on what each costs, and that is exactly what is missing. On specifications alone, TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 2x32GB has the lower true latency at 13.75 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB faster than TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 2x32GB?
- TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 2x32GB is, on true latency: 13.75 ns against 14.17 ns. PHS-memory DDR4-2400 UDIMM 2x32GB runs 2400 MT/s at CL17 and TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 2x32GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL22; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give: which is worth more depends on what each costs, and that is exactly what is missing. On specifications alone, TeamGroup Elite DDR4-3200 2x32GB has the lower true latency at 13.75 ns.