Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB
On true latency Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 comes out ahead: 12.00 ns, where TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB takes 12.67 ns. At least one of the two has no tracked price right now, so what follows compares specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | Silicon PowerValue Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6000 | 6000 |
| 36 | 38 | |
| True latency (ns) | 12.00better | 12.67 |
| Current best price | — | 532,16 €at Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-11 |
| Price per GB | — | 16,63 € |
No tracked price for Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB in detail
True latency
Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 is the lower-latency kit at 12.00 ns, against 12.67 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB — a difference of 0.67 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 runs 6000 MT/s at CL36; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL38.
Transfer rate
Both kits are rated 6000 MT/s, which is 48000 MB/s per module. Their spec sheets part company on CAS latency rather than on clock, so the true-latency figures above are what separates them.
Kit layout
Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Lighting and timings
On the lighting question: Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 does not have RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB is published with RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 runs 30-38-38-96, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB does not publish one.
Which to buy
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 is the quicker at 12.00 ns of true latency.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB?
- Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 is, on true latency: 12.00 ns against 12.67 ns. Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 runs 6000 MT/s at CL36 and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL38; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, Silicon Power Value Gaming DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL36 is the quicker at 12.00 ns of true latency.