Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 1x16GB vs Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB
On true latency Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 1x16GB comes out ahead: 10.00 ns, where Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB takes 13.75 ns. The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so what follows compares specifications alone.
| Specification | Silicon PowerXPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 1x16GB | TimetecPremium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 16 | 16 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 3200 | 3200 |
| 16 | 22 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00better | 13.75 |
| Current best price | — | 108,99 €at Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | — | 6,81 € |
No tracked price for Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 1x16GB at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 1x16GB vs Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB in detail
True latency
Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 1x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 10.00 ns, against 13.75 ns for Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB — a difference of 3.75 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 1x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16; Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL22.
Transfer rate
Both kits are rated 3200 MT/s, which is 25600 MB/s per module. Their spec sheets part company on CAS latency rather than on clock, so the true-latency figures above are what separates them.
Kit layout
Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 1x16GB ships as 2 × 8GB and Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB ships as 2 × 8GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Voltage
Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 1x16GB is specified at 1.35 V and Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB at 1.2 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile asks the board for.
Lighting, timings and ECC
On the lighting question: Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 1x16GB does not have RGB lighting, and Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB does not have RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 1x16GB runs 16-18-18-38, and Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB does not publish one. On error correction: the catalog does not state whether Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 1x16GB supports it, and Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB is published with no ECC. Whether ECC is worth having depends on the platform as much as the modules — the board and the CPU have to support it too.
Which to buy
Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 1x16GB has the lower true latency, 10.00 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 1x16GB faster than Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB?
- Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 1x16GB is, on true latency: 10.00 ns against 13.75 ns. Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 1x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16 and Timetec Premium DDR4-3200 UDIMM 2x8GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL22; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that Silicon Power XPOWER Turbine DDR4-3200 1x16GB has the lower true latency, 10.00 ns.