TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB vs Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB 2133 CL15
10.00 ns of true latency for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB against 14.06 ns for Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB 2133 CL15, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB | TimetecPremium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB 2133 CL15 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 3200better | 2133 |
| 16 | 15 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00better | 14.06 |
| Current best price | — | 189,99 €at Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | — | 5,94 € |
No tracked price for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB vs Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB 2133 CL15 in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 10.00 ns, against 14.06 ns for Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB 2133 CL15 — a difference of 4.07 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16; Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB 2133 CL15 runs 2133 MT/s at CL15.
Transfer rate
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB is rated 3200 MT/s against 2133 MT/s for Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB 2133 CL15 — 25600 MB/s per module, against 17064 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB 2133 CL15 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Voltage
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB is specified at 1.35 V and Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB 2133 CL15 at 1.2 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile asks the board for.
Lighting and ECC
On the lighting question: TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB is published with RGB lighting, and Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB 2133 CL15 does not have RGB lighting. On error correction: the catalog does not state whether TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB supports it, and Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB 2133 CL15 is published with no ECC. Whether ECC is worth having depends on the platform as much as the modules — the board and the CPU have to support it too.
Which to buy
Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB has the lower true latency, 10.00 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB faster than Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB 2133 CL15?
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB is, on true latency: 10.00 ns against 14.06 ns. TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB runs 3200 MT/s at CL16 and Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB 2133 CL15 runs 2133 MT/s at CL15; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR4-3200 2x16GB has the lower true latency, 10.00 ns.