TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB vs Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB
7.78 ns of true latency for TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB against 14.25 ns for Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. No current price is tracked for at least one of the two, so the comparison below is of specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | TeamGroupT-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB | TimetecPremium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 3600better | 2666 |
| 14 | 19 | |
| True latency (ns) | 7.78better | 14.25 |
| Current best price | — | 190,99 €at Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | — | 5,97 € |
No tracked price for TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB vs Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 7.78 ns against 14.25 ns for Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB, 6.48 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 3600 MT/s at CL14; Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB runs 2666 MT/s at CL19.
Transfer rate
TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB carries the higher rating, 3600 MT/s to 2666 MT/s for Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB — 28800 MB/s per module against 21328 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Voltage
TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB is specified at 1.45 V and Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB at 1.2 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile requests from the board.
Lighting and ECC
On lighting: TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB is published with no RGB lighting, and Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB is published with no RGB lighting. On error correction: the catalog does not state whether TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB has it, and Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB is published without ECC. ECC is a board and CPU feature as much as a module one, so it is worth having only where the platform can use it.
Which to buy
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB is the quicker at 7.78 ns of true latency.
Common questions about this pair
- Is TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB faster than Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB?
- Yes, on true latency: 7.78 ns for TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB against 14.25 ns for Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB. TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 3600 MT/s at CL14 and Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB runs 2666 MT/s at CL19, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB is the quicker at 7.78 ns of true latency.