TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB vs Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB 2400 CL17
7.78 ns of true latency for TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB against 14.17 ns for Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB 2400 CL17, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so what follows compares specifications alone.
| Specification | TeamGroupT-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB | TimetecPremium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB 2400 CL17 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 3600better | 2400 |
| 14 | 17 | |
| True latency (ns) | 7.78better | 14.17 |
| Current best price | — | 190,99 €at Amazon.es · captured 2026-09-13 |
| Price per GB | — | 5,97 € |
No tracked price for TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB at the moment. Nothing has been captured for it that this page will stand behind, so its price cells stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB vs Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB 2400 CL17 in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 7.78 ns, against 14.17 ns for Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB 2400 CL17 — a difference of 6.39 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 3600 MT/s at CL14; Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB 2400 CL17 runs 2400 MT/s at CL17.
Transfer rate
TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB is rated 3600 MT/s against 2400 MT/s for Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB 2400 CL17 — 28800 MB/s per module, against 19200 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB 2400 CL17 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Voltage
TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB is specified at 1.45 V and Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB 2400 CL17 at 1.2 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile asks the board for.
Lighting and ECC
On the lighting question: TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting, and Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB 2400 CL17 does not have RGB lighting. On error correction: the catalog does not state whether TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB supports it, and Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB 2400 CL17 is published with no ECC. Whether ECC is worth having depends on the platform as much as the modules — the board and the CPU have to support it too.
Which to buy
At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give: which is worth more depends on what each costs, and that is exactly what is missing. On specifications alone, TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB has the lower true latency at 7.78 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB faster than Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB 2400 CL17?
- TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB is, on true latency: 7.78 ns against 14.17 ns. TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB runs 3600 MT/s at CL14 and Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB 2400 CL17 runs 2400 MT/s at CL17; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give: which is worth more depends on what each costs, and that is exactly what is missing. On specifications alone, TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z DDR4-3600 2x16GB has the lower true latency at 7.78 ns.