Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x16GB vs Timetec Premium DDR5-4800 UDIMM 2x16GB 5600 CL46
16.43 ns of true latency for Timetec Premium DDR5-4800 UDIMM 2x16GB 5600 CL46 against 16.67 ns for Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x16GB, so the first of those is the quicker to respond. The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so what follows compares specifications alone.
| Specification | CorsairVengeance DDR5-4800 2x16GB | TimetecPremium DDR5-4800 UDIMM 2x16GB 5600 CL46 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 4800 | 5600better |
| 40 | 46 | |
| True latency (ns) | 16.67 | 16.43better |
| Current best price | — | — |
| Price per GB | — | — |
Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x16GB vs Timetec Premium DDR5-4800 UDIMM 2x16GB 5600 CL46 in detail
True latency
Timetec Premium DDR5-4800 UDIMM 2x16GB 5600 CL46 is the lower-latency kit at 16.43 ns against 16.67 ns for Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x16GB, 0.24 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x16GB runs 4800 MT/s at CL40; Timetec Premium DDR5-4800 UDIMM 2x16GB 5600 CL46 runs 5600 MT/s at CL46.
Transfer rate
Timetec Premium DDR5-4800 UDIMM 2x16GB 5600 CL46 carries the higher rating, 5600 MT/s to 4800 MT/s for Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x16GB — 44800 MB/s per module against 38400 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and Timetec Premium DDR5-4800 UDIMM 2x16GB 5600 CL46 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Lighting and ECC
On lighting: Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x16GB is published with no RGB lighting, and Timetec Premium DDR5-4800 UDIMM 2x16GB 5600 CL46 is published with no RGB lighting. On error correction: the catalog does not state whether Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x16GB has it, and Timetec Premium DDR5-4800 UDIMM 2x16GB 5600 CL46 is published without ECC. ECC is a board and CPU feature as much as a module one, so it is worth having only where the platform can use it.
Which to buy
At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give: which is worth more depends on what each costs, and that is exactly what is missing. On specifications alone, Timetec Premium DDR5-4800 UDIMM 2x16GB 5600 CL46 has the lower true latency at 16.43 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x16GB faster than Timetec Premium DDR5-4800 UDIMM 2x16GB 5600 CL46?
- Yes, on true latency: 16.43 ns for Timetec Premium DDR5-4800 UDIMM 2x16GB 5600 CL46 against 16.67 ns for Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x16GB. Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800 2x16GB runs 4800 MT/s at CL40 and Timetec Premium DDR5-4800 UDIMM 2x16GB 5600 CL46 runs 5600 MT/s at CL46, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give: which is worth more depends on what each costs, and that is exactly what is missing. On specifications alone, Timetec Premium DDR5-4800 UDIMM 2x16GB 5600 CL46 has the lower true latency at 16.43 ns.