Crucial Pro DDR5-6400 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28
On true latency TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 comes out ahead: 9.33 ns, where Crucial Pro DDR5-6400 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB takes 10.00 ns. At least one of the two has no tracked price right now, so what follows compares specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | CrucialPro DDR5-6400 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB | TeamGroupT-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6400better | 6000 |
| 32 | 28 | |
| True latency (ns) | 10.00 | 9.33better |
| Current best price | — | — |
| Price per GB | — | — |
Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Crucial Pro DDR5-6400 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB vs TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 in detail
True latency
TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is the lower-latency kit at 9.33 ns, against 10.00 ns for Crucial Pro DDR5-6400 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB — a difference of 0.67 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. Crucial Pro DDR5-6400 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32; TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28.
Transfer rate
Crucial Pro DDR5-6400 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB is rated 6400 MT/s against 6000 MT/s for TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 — 51200 MB/s per module, against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
Crucial Pro DDR5-6400 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Voltage
Crucial Pro DDR5-6400 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB is specified at 1.35 V and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 at 1.4 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile asks the board for.
Lighting and timings
On the lighting question: Crucial Pro DDR5-6400 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is published with RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple, the numbers that follow CAS: Crucial Pro DDR5-6400 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB runs 32-40-40-103, and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 does not publish one.
Which to buy
Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 has the lower true latency, 9.33 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Crucial Pro DDR5-6400 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB faster than TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28?
- TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 is, on true latency: 9.33 ns against 10.00 ns. Crucial Pro DDR5-6400 Overclocking Memory 2x16GB runs 6400 MT/s at CL32 and TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 runs 6000 MT/s at CL28; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that TeamGroup T-Force Delta RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB CL28 has the lower true latency, 9.33 ns.