Gigastone Game Pro DDR5-6000 4x32GB 6400 CL40 vs PHS-memory DDR5-5600 UDIMM 2x64GB
Gigastone Game Pro DDR5-6000 4x32GB 6400 CL40 has the lower true latency of the two at 12.50 ns, against 16.43 ns for PHS-memory DDR5-5600 UDIMM 2x64GB. At least one of the two has no tracked price right now, so what follows compares specifications rather than cost.
| Specification | GigastoneGame Pro DDR5-6000 4x32GB 6400 CL40 | PHS-memoryDDR5-5600 UDIMM 2x64GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 128 | 128 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 6400better | 5600 |
| 40 | 46 | |
| True latency (ns) | 12.50better | 16.43 |
| Current best price | — | — |
| Price per GB | — | — |
Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
Gigastone Game Pro DDR5-6000 4x32GB 6400 CL40 vs PHS-memory DDR5-5600 UDIMM 2x64GB in detail
True latency
Gigastone Game Pro DDR5-6000 4x32GB 6400 CL40 is the lower-latency kit at 12.50 ns against 16.43 ns for PHS-memory DDR5-5600 UDIMM 2x64GB, 3.93 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. Gigastone Game Pro DDR5-6000 4x32GB 6400 CL40 runs 6400 MT/s at CL40; PHS-memory DDR5-5600 UDIMM 2x64GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL46.
Transfer rate
Gigastone Game Pro DDR5-6000 4x32GB 6400 CL40 carries the higher rating, 6400 MT/s to 5600 MT/s for PHS-memory DDR5-5600 UDIMM 2x64GB — 51200 MB/s per module against 44800 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.
Kit layout
Gigastone Game Pro DDR5-6000 4x32GB 6400 CL40 ships as 4 × 32GB, PHS-memory DDR5-5600 UDIMM 2x64GB ships as 2 × 64GB. A real difference, and not a ranking: more sticks fill more channels on a board that has them, while fewer sticks leave slots free for adding later. Which suits comes down to the board and to whether more memory is planned.
Voltage
Gigastone Game Pro DDR5-6000 4x32GB 6400 CL40 is specified at 1.3 V and PHS-memory DDR5-5600 UDIMM 2x64GB at 1.1 V. That is the supply each kit's published profile requests from the board.
Lighting and timings
On lighting: Gigastone Game Pro DDR5-6000 4x32GB 6400 CL40 is published with no RGB lighting, and PHS-memory DDR5-5600 UDIMM 2x64GB is published with no RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — Gigastone Game Pro DDR5-6000 4x32GB 6400 CL40 is 40-40-40-84, and PHS-memory DDR5-5600 UDIMM 2x64GB publishes none.
Which to buy
Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that Gigastone Game Pro DDR5-6000 4x32GB 6400 CL40 has the lower true latency, 12.50 ns.
Common questions about this pair
- Is Gigastone Game Pro DDR5-6000 4x32GB 6400 CL40 faster than PHS-memory DDR5-5600 UDIMM 2x64GB?
- Yes, on true latency: 12.50 ns for Gigastone Game Pro DDR5-6000 4x32GB 6400 CL40 against 16.43 ns for PHS-memory DDR5-5600 UDIMM 2x64GB. Gigastone Game Pro DDR5-6000 4x32GB 6400 CL40 runs 6400 MT/s at CL40 and PHS-memory DDR5-5600 UDIMM 2x64GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL46, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- Without a tracked price for both, this page cannot say which to buy — the answer depends on cost, and cost is what is absent. What the specifications do say is that Gigastone Game Pro DDR5-6000 4x32GB 6400 CL40 has the lower true latency, 12.50 ns.