G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-5600 2x16GB vs Kingston FURY Impact DDR5-5600 2x16GB
G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-5600 2x16GB and Kingston FURY Impact DDR5-5600 2x16GB arrive at the same true latency, 14.29 ns apiece. The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so what follows compares specifications alone.
| Specification | G.SkillRipjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-5600 2x16GB | KingstonFURY Impact DDR5-5600 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 5600 | 5600 |
| 40 | 40 | |
| True latency (ns) | 14.29 | 14.29 |
| Current best price | — | — |
| Price per GB | — | — |
Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-5600 2x16GB vs Kingston FURY Impact DDR5-5600 2x16GB in detail
True latency
Both kits land on 14.29 ns. Neither spec sheet differs from the other on the two figures that decide it — 5600 MT/s at CL40 on each side — so the reconciled result is identical rather than merely close.
Transfer rate
Both kits are rated 5600 MT/s, which is 44800 MB/s per module, and both are published at CL40. Those are the two figures the true latency above is computed from, so it comes out the same for each.
Kit layout
G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-5600 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and Kingston FURY Impact DDR5-5600 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.
Lighting and timings
On lighting: G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-5600 2x16GB is published with no RGB lighting, and Kingston FURY Impact DDR5-5600 2x16GB is published with no RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-5600 2x16GB is 40-40-40-89, and Kingston FURY Impact DDR5-5600 2x16GB is 40-40-40.
Which to buy
At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give — and the specifications do not break the tie either: both arrive at 14.29 ns of true latency. What is left to choose on is above.
Common questions about this pair
- Is G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-5600 2x16GB faster than Kingston FURY Impact DDR5-5600 2x16GB?
- Neither is. Both work out at 14.29 ns of true latency — G.Skill Ripjaws SO-DIMM DDR5-5600 2x16GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL40, Kingston FURY Impact DDR5-5600 2x16GB runs 5600 MT/s at CL40, and those two land in the same place.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give — and the specifications do not break the tie either: both arrive at 14.29 ns of true latency. What is left to choose on is above.