G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB vs Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB
G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB has the lower true latency of the two at 8.00 ns, against 14.25 ns for Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB. The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so what follows compares specifications alone.
| Specification | G.SkillTrident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB | TimetecPremium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (GB) | 32 | 32 |
| Speed (MT/s) | 4000better | 2666 |
| 16 | 19 | |
| True latency (ns) | 8.00better | 14.25 |
| Current best price | — | — |
| Price per GB | — | — |
Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.
G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB vs Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB in detail
True latency
G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB is the lower-latency kit at 8.00 ns, against 14.25 ns for Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB — a difference of 6.25 ns. That figure is what reconciles the two spec sheets: CAS latency counts clock cycles, so it only means something next to the clock it counts. G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB runs 4000 MT/s at CL16; Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB runs 2666 MT/s at CL19.
Transfer rate
G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB is rated 4000 MT/s against 2666 MT/s for Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB — 32000 MB/s per module, against 21328 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: reaching a higher clock costs more cycles on each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too, and why the true latency above is the figure that compares directly.
Kit layout
G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks either way, so both populate a board's slots identically.
Lighting and ECC
On the lighting question: G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB is published with RGB lighting, and Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB does not have RGB lighting. On error correction: the catalog does not state whether G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB supports it, and Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB is published with no ECC. Whether ECC is worth having depends on the platform as much as the modules — the board and the CPU have to support it too.
Which to buy
The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB is the quicker at 8.00 ns of true latency.
Common questions about this pair
- Is G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB faster than Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB?
- G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB is, on true latency: 8.00 ns against 14.25 ns. G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB runs 4000 MT/s at CL16 and Timetec Premium DDR4-2666 UDIMM 2x16GB runs 2666 MT/s at CL19; the CAS numbers alone do not settle it, because they count clock cycles rather than time.
- Which of these two should I buy?
- The site holds no current price for at least one of these, so no buying answer follows: which is worth more turns on what each costs, and that figure is the one missing. On the specifications alone, G.Skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-4000 2x16GB is the quicker at 8.00 ns of true latency.