G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB vs Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38

G.SKILLTrident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB32 GB · 6000 MT/s · 30 CL · 10.00 ns
PatriotViper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL3832 GB · 8200 MT/s · 38 CL · 9.27 nsLeads on Speed
In short

On true latency Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 comes out ahead: 9.27 ns, where G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB takes 10.00 ns. At least one of the two has no tracked price right now, so what follows compares specifications rather than cost.

SpecificationG.SKILLTrident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GBPatriotViper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38
Capacity (GB)3232
Speed (MT/s)60008200better
3038
True latency (ns)10.009.27better
Current best price
Price per GB

Neither kit has a tracked price at the moment. Nothing has been captured that this page will stand behind, so the price rows stay empty rather than carrying a stale figure.

G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB vs Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 in detail

True latency

Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 is the lower-latency kit at 9.27 ns against 10.00 ns for G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB, 0.73 ns between them. That is the figure that reconciles the two spec sheets: a CAS number counts cycles, and cycles mean nothing apart from the rate they are counted at. G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL30; Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 runs 8200 MT/s at CL38.

Transfer rate

Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 carries the higher rating, 8200 MT/s to 6000 MT/s for G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB — 65600 MB/s per module against 48000 MB/s. That is peak transfer rate, not access time: a higher clock is reached by counting more cycles for each access, which is why the CAS numbers differ too and why the true latency above is the directly comparable figure.

Kit layout

G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB ships as 2 × 16GB and Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 ships as 2 × 16GB — the same number of sticks on both sides, so they populate a board's slots the same way.

Lighting and timings

On lighting: G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB has RGB lighting, and Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 is published with no RGB lighting. On the full timing tuple — the numbers after CAS — G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB is 30-40-40-96, and Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 publishes none.

Which to buy

At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give: which is worth more depends on what each costs, and that is exactly what is missing. On specifications alone, Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 has the lower true latency at 9.27 ns.

Common questions about this pair

Is G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB faster than Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38?
Yes, on true latency: 9.27 ns for Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 against 10.00 ns for G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB. G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6000 2x16GB runs 6000 MT/s at CL30 and Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 runs 8200 MT/s at CL38, and the CAS numbers alone will not settle it — they count clock cycles, not time.
Which of these two should I buy?
At least one of these kits has no tracked price right now, so this page has no buying answer to give: which is worth more depends on what each costs, and that is exactly what is missing. On specifications alone, Patriot Viper Xtreme 5 DDR5-8000 2x16GB 8200 CL38 has the lower true latency at 9.27 ns.
How we track prices

Related comparisons